J Weichert1, M Gembicki1, J Ribbat-Idel2, D R Hartge1. 1. Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany. 2. Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To scrutinize the validity of a novel angle (maxilla-mandible-nasion angle, MMN) as objective proof of midfacial hypoplasia in trisomy 21 fetuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volume data sets of 2(nd) trimester fetuses were reviewed in this retrospective study. After achievement of the correct midsagittal position, the fetal profile line (FP line) and the mandibulo-maxillary line (MML) were applied and the resulting angle was calculated. Additionally, the prefrontal space ratio (PFSR) was assessed. Both measurements were obtained from 401 euploid fetuses and 42 fetuses with trisomy 21. Values for MMN and PFSR<5(th) percentile were considered abnormal. RESULTS: The study included 443 fetuses with a mean gestational age of 21.3 weeks (range: 14.0-26.3). The MMN angle sufficiently identified hypoplasia of the midface in trisomy 21 fetuses (mean: 14.6°; range: 10.1°- 22.0°) compared to controls (mean: 20.5°; range: 17.3°-23.7°; p<0.0001). Concomitantly, the PFSR of Down syndrome fetuses was significantly lower (mean: 0.53; range: 0.21-1.22) than in euploid individuals (1.38; range: 0.54-2.23; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Calculation of the novel MMN angle in 2(nd) trimester fetuses reliably allows rapid assessment of craniofacial anatomy in order to rule out the midfacial hypoplasia frequently found in trisomy 21.
PURPOSE: To scrutinize the validity of a novel angle (maxilla-mandible-nasion angle, MMN) as objective proof of midfacial hypoplasia in trisomy 21 fetuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volume data sets of 2(nd) trimester fetuses were reviewed in this retrospective study. After achievement of the correct midsagittal position, the fetal profile line (FP line) and the mandibulo-maxillary line (MML) were applied and the resulting angle was calculated. Additionally, the prefrontal space ratio (PFSR) was assessed. Both measurements were obtained from 401 euploid fetuses and 42 fetuses with trisomy 21. Values for MMN and PFSR<5(th) percentile were considered abnormal. RESULTS: The study included 443 fetuses with a mean gestational age of 21.3 weeks (range: 14.0-26.3). The MMN angle sufficiently identified hypoplasia of the midface in trisomy 21 fetuses (mean: 14.6°; range: 10.1°- 22.0°) compared to controls (mean: 20.5°; range: 17.3°-23.7°; p<0.0001). Concomitantly, the PFSR of Down syndrome fetuses was significantly lower (mean: 0.53; range: 0.21-1.22) than in euploid individuals (1.38; range: 0.54-2.23; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Calculation of the novel MMN angle in 2(nd) trimester fetuses reliably allows rapid assessment of craniofacial anatomy in order to rule out the midfacial hypoplasia frequently found in trisomy 21.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D ultrasound; face; jaws; midfacial hypoplasia; trisomy 21
Authors: B Yazdi; J Sonek; C Oettling; M Hoopmann; H Abele; M Schaelike; K O Kagan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: F I Vos; E A P De Jong-Pleij; M Bakker; E Tromp; E Pajkrt; K O Kagan; C M Bilardo Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: E A P De Jong-Pleij; F I Vos; L S M Ribbert; L R Pistorius; E Tromp; C M Bilardo Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 7.299