BACKGROUND: Women who have preeclampsia during pregnancy are at reduced risk of subsequent breast cancer. We examined whether other markers of reduced placental size or function, including increased blood pressure during pregnancy, predict a reduction in maternal breast cancer. METHODS: The Child Health and Development Studies is a 40-year follow-up of pregnant women enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente health plan between 1959 and 1967. We identified 3804 white women for whom data were available on placental examinations and other study variables. As of 1997, 146 women had developed invasive breast cancer. Proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations of breast cancer with markers of placental function. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A blood pressure increase between the second and third trimesters exhibited a linear relationship with breast cancer rate, with the highest quartile showing a 51% reduction (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20% to 70%) that was not explained by preeclampsia. Smaller placental diameter was independently associated with a reduced breast cancer rate; the association increased with age at first pregnancy (P =.008). Maternal floor infarction of the placenta was associated with a 60% reduction in breast cancer rate (95% CI = 12% to 82%). In combination, placental risk factors were associated with a reduction in the breast cancer rate of as high as 94% (95% CI = 80% to 98%). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller placentas, maternal floor infarction of the placenta, and increasing blood pressure during pregnancy were associated with reduced maternal breast cancer. In the case of smaller placental diameter, the larger reduction observed with older age at first pregnancy suggests a process in which promotion of an existing lesion is blocked. Elucidating the mechanisms for these associations could provide clues to breast cancer prevention and treatment.
BACKGROUND:Women who have preeclampsia during pregnancy are at reduced risk of subsequent breast cancer. We examined whether other markers of reduced placental size or function, including increased blood pressure during pregnancy, predict a reduction in maternal breast cancer. METHODS: The Child Health and Development Studies is a 40-year follow-up of pregnant women enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente health plan between 1959 and 1967. We identified 3804 white women for whom data were available on placental examinations and other study variables. As of 1997, 146 women had developed invasive breast cancer. Proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations of breast cancer with markers of placental function. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A blood pressure increase between the second and third trimesters exhibited a linear relationship with breast cancer rate, with the highest quartile showing a 51% reduction (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20% to 70%) that was not explained by preeclampsia. Smaller placental diameter was independently associated with a reduced breast cancer rate; the association increased with age at first pregnancy (P =.008). Maternal floor infarction of the placenta was associated with a 60% reduction in breast cancer rate (95% CI = 12% to 82%). In combination, placental risk factors were associated with a reduction in the breast cancer rate of as high as 94% (95% CI = 80% to 98%). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller placentas, maternal floor infarction of the placenta, and increasing blood pressure during pregnancy were associated with reduced maternal breast cancer. In the case of smaller placental diameter, the larger reduction observed with older age at first pregnancy suggests a process in which promotion of an existing lesion is blocked. Elucidating the mechanisms for these associations could provide clues to breast cancer prevention and treatment.
Authors: E Susser; S Buka; C A Schaefer; H Andrews; P M Cirillo; P Factor-Litvak; M Gillman; J M Goldstein; P Ivey Henry; L H Lumey; I W McKeague; K B Michels; M B Terry; B A Cohn Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Bruce G Link; Ezra S Susser; Pam Factor-Litvak; Dana March; Katrina L Kezios; Gina S Lovasi; Andrew G Rundle; Shakira F Suglia; Kim M Fader; Howard F Andrews; Eileen Johnson; Piera M Cirillo; Barbara A Cohn Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Rebecca Troisi; Anne Gulbech Ording; Tom Grotmol; Ingrid Glimelius; Anders Engeland; Mika Gissler; Britton Trabert; Anders Ekbom; Laura Madanat-Harjuoja; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Steinar Tretli; Tone Bjørge Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Sven Cnattingius; Sandra Eloranta; Hans-Olov Adami; Ove Axelsson; Paul W Dickman; Chung-cheng Hsieh; Lorelei A Mucci; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Mats Lambe; Anna L V Johansson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.254