Literature DB >> 11480593

Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients.

N D Downing1, D I Clark, J W Hutchinson, K Colclough, P W Howard.   

Abstract

We studied the hip abductor strength and Trendelenburg test prospectively in 100 patients undergoing total hip replacement via a lateral or posterior approach. In 49 patients, we used the lateral approach to implant the Charnley total hip replacement, and in 51 patients, the posterior approach to implant the Exeter total hip. Isometric abductor strength was measured with the kinetic communicator device and the Trendelenburg test was recorded preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Of the original 100 patients, 83 were available for study at 3 months and 73 at 12 months. Hip abductor strength and the Trendelenburg test improved postoperatively in both groups, but we found no difference in hip abductor strength recovery at 3 and 12 months between the lateral approach and the posterior approach. Similarly there was no difference in the Trendelenburg test between the two groups 3 and 12 months following hip replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11480593     DOI: 10.1080/00016470152846501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  26 in total

Review 1.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach].

Authors:  F Rachbauer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phonthakorn Panichkul; Suthorn Bavonratanavech; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 3.  Acetabular orientation: anterolateral approach in the supine position.

Authors:  Matthew S Austin; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Is there faster recovery with an anterior or anterolateral THA? A pilot study.

Authors:  Virginia Klausmeier; Vipul Lugade; Brian A Jewett; Dennis K Collis; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications following the posterior and lateral surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Berstock; A W Blom; A D Beswick
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The effect of surgical approach on gait mechanics after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph Zeni; Kathleen Madara; Hunter Witmer; Riley Gerhardt; James Rubano
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 7.  Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chinundorn Putananon; Harit Tuchinda; Alisara Arirachakaran; Siwadol Wongsak; Thana Narinsorasak; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-09-27

8.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach].

Authors:  F Rachbauer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results.

Authors:  Kirsten L Poehling-Monaghan; Atul F Kamath; Michael J Taunton; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Obesity is a major risk factor for prosthetic infection after primary hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michelle M Dowsey; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.