Literature DB >> 11480090

[Endoprosthetic surface replacement of the head of the humerus].

B Fink1, J M Strauss, U Lamla, T Kurz, H Guderian, W Rüther.   

Abstract

The concept of an endoprosthetic surface replacement of the humeral head differs from that of stemmed endoprostheses. It is the replacement of the destroyed joint surface with reconstruction of the normal anatomy and minimal bone resection. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the short-term results of a newly developed cup arthroplasty (Durom-Cup) for the humeral head. In a prospective study, 39 patients with 46 Durom-Cups were evaluated preoperatively and every 3 months postoperatively. The average follow-up was 15 +/- 9 months. The group included 28 shoulders with rheumatoid arthritis, 15 joints with osteoarthritis, and 3 humeral head necroses. The Constant-score and SAS-function score were used. The Constant-score increased from 20.25 +/- 9.06 points preoperatively to 46.62 +/- 14.05 at 3 months, to 48.11 +/- 14.49 at 6 months, and to 55.25 +/- 11.6 at 9 months postoperatively. The Constant-score stayed at this level during further follow-up and was 55.81 +/- 16.31 at 12 months postoperatively. The best results were seen in the group of humeral head necroses with a Constant-score of 71.0 +/- 12.2 compared to 54.66 +/- 13.89 in the group of osteoarthritis and 56.78 +/- 13.33 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at 12 months postoperatively. The results with the Durom-Cup are encouraging so that cup arthroplasty seems to be a good alternative to stemmed prostheses. The main advantages of the humeral head resurfacing are the bone-preserving fixation and the relatively simple surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11480090     DOI: 10.1007/s001320170087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  5 in total

1.  [Resurfacing of the humeral head : sensible indications].

Authors:  B Fink; A Niemeier; W Rüther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Use of Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Massive Bone Loss From Tumor and Failed Arthroplasty: A Viable Option in the Upper Extremity.

Authors:  Krista A Goulding; Adam Schwartz; Steven J Hattrup; R Lor Randall; Donald Lee; Damian M Rispoli; Daniel M Lerman; Christopher Beauchamp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Rheumatoid shoulder: does minimally invasive therapy make sense?].

Authors:  A Kiekenbeck; M Preis; G Salzmann
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  [Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years of age].

Authors:  P Raiss; G Pape; S Becker; M Rickert; M Loew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Surface replacement shoulder: arthroplasty indications and limits].

Authors:  A Werner; A Hedtmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.004

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.