Literature DB >> 11479566

Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure.

S P Golovan1, R G Meidinger, A Ajakaiye, M Cottrill, M Z Wiederkehr, D J Barney, C Plante, J W Pollard, M Z Fan, M A Hayes, J Laursen, J P Hjorth, R R Hacker, J P Phillips, C W Forsberg.   

Abstract

To address the problem of manure-based environmental pollution in the pork industry, we have developed the phytase transgenic pig. The saliva of these pigs contains the enzyme phytase, which allows the pigs to digest the phosphorus in phytate, the most abundant source of phosphorus in the pig diet. Without this enzyme, phytate phosphorus passes undigested into manure to become the single most important manure pollutant of pork production. We show here that salivary phytase provides essentially complete digestion of dietary phytate phosphorus, relieves the requirement for inorganic phosphate supplements, and reduces fecal phosphorus output by up to 75%. These pigs offer a unique biological approach to the management of phosphorus nutrition and environmental pollution in the pork industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11479566     DOI: 10.1038/90788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  57 in total

1.  Phosphorus cycle: A broken biogeochemical cycle.

Authors:  James Elser; Elena Bennett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Genetically engineered livestock for agriculture: a generation after the first transgenic animal research conference.

Authors:  James D Murray; Elizabeth A Maga
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Germline modification of domestic animals.

Authors:  L Tang; R González; I Dobrinski
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.807

4.  Avian multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase is an active phytase that can be engineered to help ameliorate the planet's "phosphate crisis".

Authors:  Jaiesoon Cho; Kuicheon Choi; Thomas Darden; Paul R Reynolds; James N Petitte; Stephen B Shears
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Shifting the pH profile of Aspergillus niger PhyA phytase to match the stomach pH enhances its effectiveness as an animal feed additive.

Authors:  Taewan Kim; Edward J Mullaney; Jesus M Porres; Karl R Roneker; Sarah Crowe; Sarah Rice; Taegu Ko; Abul H J Ullah; Catherine B Daly; Ross Welch; Xin Gen Lei
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Animal transgenesis: state of the art and applications.

Authors:  Eduardo O Melo; Aurea M O Canavessi; Mauricio M Franco; Rodolfo Rumpf
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Genetic modifications of pigs for medicine and agriculture.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Whyte; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  β-Glucanase specific expression in the parotid gland of transgenic mice.

Authors:  Li-zheng Guan; Yu-ping Sun; Qian-yun Xi; Jing-lan Wang; Jun-yun Zhou; Gang Shu; Qing-yan Jiang; Yong-liang Zhang
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Metabolic profiling of the Arabidopsis pkl mutant reveals selective derepression of embryonic traits.

Authors:  Stanley Dean Rider; Matthew R Hemm; Heather A Hostetler; Hui-Chun Li; Clint Chapple; Joe Ogas
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Is there a risk from not using GE animals?

Authors:  James D Murray; Elizabeth A Maga
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.