Literature DB >> 26820413

Genetically engineered livestock for agriculture: a generation after the first transgenic animal research conference.

James D Murray1,2, Elizabeth A Maga3.   

Abstract

At the time of the first Transgenic Animal Research Conference, the lack of knowledge about promoter, enhancer and coding regions of genes of interest greatly hampered our efforts to create transgenes that would express appropriately in livestock. Additionally, we were limited to gene insertion by pronuclear microinjection. As predicted then, widespread genome sequencing efforts and technological advancements have profoundly altered what we can do. There have been many developments in technology to create transgenic animals since we first met at Granlibakken in 1997, including the advent of somatic cell nuclear transfer-based cloning and gene editing. We can now create new transgenes that will express when and where we want and can target precisely in the genome where we want to make a change or insert a transgene. With the large number of sequenced genomes, we have unprecedented access to sequence information including, control regions, coding regions, and known allelic variants. These technological developments have ushered in new and renewed enthusiasm for the production of transgenic animals among scientists and animal agriculturalists around the world, both for the production of more relevant biomedical research models as well as for agricultural applications. However, even though great advancements have been made in our ability to control gene expression and target genetic changes in our animals, there still are no genetically engineered animal products on the market for food. World-wide there has been a failure of the regulatory processes to effectively move forward. Estimates suggest the world will need to increase our current food production 70 % by 2050; that is we will have to produce the total amount of food each year that has been consumed by mankind over the past 500 years. The combination of transgenic animal technology and gene editing will become increasingly more important tools to help feed the world. However, to date the practical benefits of these technologies have not yet reached consumers in any country and in the absence of predictable, science-based regulatory programs it is unlikely that the benefits will be realized in the short to medium term.

Keywords:  GE; Livestock; Review; TARC; Transgenic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26820413     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-016-9927-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  51 in total

Review 1.  Making transgenic livestock: genetic engineering on a large scale.

Authors:  R J Wall; H W Hawk; N Nel
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.429

2.  A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors.

Authors:  Matthew J Moscou; Adam J Bogdanove
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A Fire; S Xu; M K Montgomery; S A Kostas; S E Driver; C C Mello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Molecular reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc1-like transposon from fish, and its transposition in human cells.

Authors:  Z Ivics; P B Hackett; R H Plasterk; Z Izsvák
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-11-14       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  TALE nickase-mediated SP110 knockin endows cattle with increased resistance to tuberculosis.

Authors:  Haibo Wu; Yongsheng Wang; Yan Zhang; Mingqi Yang; Jiaxing Lv; Jun Liu; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts.

Authors:  A E Schnieke; A J Kind; W A Ritchie; K Mycock; A R Scott; M Ritchie; I Wilmut; A Colman; K H Campbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Dramatic growth of mice that develop from eggs microinjected with metallothionein-growth hormone fusion genes.

Authors:  R D Palmiter; R L Brinster; R E Hammer; M E Trumbauer; M G Rosenfeld; N C Birnberg; R M Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells.

Authors:  Sundar Durai; Mala Mani; Karthikeyan Kandavelou; Joy Wu; Matthew H Porteus; Srinivasan Chandrasegaran
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advances in genome editing for improved animal breeding: A review.

Authors:  Shakil Ahmad Bhat; Abrar Ahad Malik; Syed Mudasir Ahmad; Riaz Ahmad Shah; Nazir Ahmad Ganai; Syed Shanaz Shafi; Nadeem Shabir
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-11-21

2.  CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection in oocytes disables pancreas development in sheep.

Authors:  Marcela Vilarino; Sheikh Tamir Rashid; Fabian Patrik Suchy; Bret Roberts McNabb; Talitha van der Meulen; Eli J Fine; Syed Daniyal Ahsan; Nurlybek Mursaliyev; Vittorio Sebastiano; Santiago Sain Diab; Mark O Huising; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Engineering bone phenotypes in domestic animals: Unique resources for enhancing musculoskeletal research.

Authors:  Larry J Suva; Mark E Westhusin; Charles R Long; Dana Gaddy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The Improved Milk Quality and Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Effect in Acetylserotonin-O-methyltransferase (ASMT) Overexpressed Goats: An Association with the Elevated Endogenous Melatonin Production.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Xudai Cui; Shengyu Guan; Guangdong Li; Yujun Yao; Haixin Wu; Jinlong Zhang; Xiaosheng Zhang; Tuan Yu; Yunxiang Li; Zhengxing Lian; Lu Zhang; Guoshi Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.