Literature DB >> 11479359

Should physicians be gatekeepers of medical resources?

M C Weinstein1.   

Abstract

Physicians have an ethical responsibility to their patients to offer the best available medical care. This responsibility conflicts with their role as gatekeepers of the limited health care resources available for all patients collectively. It is ethically untenable to expect doctors to face this trade-off during each patient encounter; the physician cannot be expected to compromise the wellbeing of the patient in the office in favour of anonymous patients elsewhere. Hence, as in other domains of public policy where individual and collective interests conflict, some form of collective solution is required. Collective solutions may take the form of placing explicit resource constraints on resources available to physicians, or clinical practice guidelines that recognise cost-effective care as acceptable. Such solutions will be politically and ethically sustainable only if patients as citizens of the larger population accept the need for rationing of limited resources in health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11479359      PMCID: PMC1733427          DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.4.268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Expert panel vs decision-analysis recommendations for postdischarge coronary angiography after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K M Kuntz; J Tsevat; M C Weinstein; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Barriers to using cost-effectiveness analysis in managed care decision making.

Authors:  L A Prosser; J P Koplan; P J Neumann; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Protecting the medical commons: who is responsible?

Authors:  H H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A M Garber; C E Phelps
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Principles of cost-effective resource allocation in health care organizations.

Authors:  M C Weinstein
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE)

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-10

8.  Domestic violence and the internist's response: advocacy or apathy?

Authors:  A L Kellermann
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; W B Stason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  The pressure to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from critically ill patients in the United States.

Authors:  John M Luce; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  General practitioners' relationship to sickness certification.

Authors:  Pål Gulbrandsen; Dag Hofoss; Magne Nylenna; Jurate Saltyte-Benth; Olaf G Aasland
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 3.  Shining light on advanced NSCLC in 2017: combining immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Meng Qiao; Tao Jiang; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Ethical problems in radiology: radiological consumerism.

Authors:  N Magnavita; A Bergamaschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Courtney Tyne; Douglas W Blayney; Diane Blum; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Do Dialysis Decision Aids Improve Treatment Decision-Making?

Authors:  Rachael Morton
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Prevalence and determinants of physician bedside rationing: data from Europe.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Anne-Marie Slowther; Reidun Forde; Renzo Pegoraro; Stella Reiter-Theil; Arnaud Perrier; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Marion Danis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  A game theoretic approach reveals that discretizing clinical information can reduce antibiotic misuse.

Authors:  Maya Diamant; Shoham Baruch; Eias Kassem; Khitam Muhsen; Dov Samet; Moshe Leshno; Uri Obolski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Difficulty in securing treatment for degenerative hip disease in a patient with Down syndrome: the gap remains open.

Authors:  Chandler E Gill; Henry M Taylor; K T Lin; Bimal B Padaliya; William J Newman; Anna I Abramovitch; CaraLee R Richardson; P David Charles
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  The role of economic evaluation in the decision-making process of family physicians: design and methods of a qualitative embedded multiple-case study.

Authors:  Chantale Lessard; André-Pierre Contandriopoulos; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.