Literature DB >> 11479220

Differing contribution of thiopurine methyltransferase to mercaptopurine versus thioguanine effects in human leukemic cells.

T Dervieux1, J G Blanco, E Y Krynetski, E F Vanin, M F Roussel, M V Relling.   

Abstract

Thioguanine and mercaptopurine are prodrugs requiring conversion into thiopurine nucleotides to exert cytotoxicity. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT), an enzyme subject to genetic polymorphism, catabolizes thiopurines into inactive methylated bases, but also produces methylthioguanine nucleotides and methylmercaptopurine nucleotides from thioguanine and mercaptopurine nucleotides, respectively. To study the effect of TPMT on activation versus inactivation of mercaptopurine and thioguanine, we used a retroviral gene transfer technique to develop human CCRF-CEM cell lines that did (TPMT+) and did not (MOCK) overexpress TPMT. After transduction, TPMT activities were 14-fold higher in the TPMT+ versus the MOCK cell lines (P < 0.001). TPMT+ cells were less sensitive to thioguanine than MOCK cells (IC(50) = 1.10+/- 0.12 microM versus 0.55 +/- 0.19 microM; P = 0.02); in contrast, TPMT+ cells were more sensitive to mercaptopurine than MOCK cells (IC(50) = 0.52 +/- 0.20 microM versus 1.50 +/- 0.23 microM; P < 0.01). The lower sensitivity of TPMT+ versus MOCK cells to thioguanine was associated with lower thioguanine nucleotide concentrations (917 +/- 282 versus 1515 +/- 183 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells; P = 0.01), higher methylthioguanine nucleotide concentrations (252 +/- 34 versus 27 +/- 10 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells; P = 0.01), less inhibition of de novo purine synthesis (13 versus 95%; P < 0.01), and lower deoxythioguanosine incorporation into DNA (2.0 +/- 0.6% versus 7.2 +/- 2.0%; P < 0.001). The higher sensitivity of TPMT+ cells to mercaptopurine was associated with higher concentrations of methylmercaptopurine nucleotide (2601 +/- 1055 versus 174 +/- 77 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells; P = 0.01) and greater inhibition of de novo purine synthesis (>99% versus 74%; P < 0.01) compared with MOCK cells. We conclude that methylation of mercaptopurine contributes to the antiproliferative properties of the drug, probably through inhibition of de novo purine synthesis by methylmercaptopurine nucleotides, whereas thioguanine is inactivated primarily by TPMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11479220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  24 in total

Review 1.  Molecular pharmacodynamics in childhood leukemia.

Authors:  R Pieters; M L den Boer
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Safety of azathioprine use during pregnancy.

Authors:  Aniket Natekar; Anna Pupco; Pina Bozzo; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomics in pediatric leukemia.

Authors:  Steven W Paugh; Gabriele Stocco; William E Evans
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  Thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: new strategies for optimization of pharmacotherapy?

Authors:  Luc J J Derijks; Daniel W Hommes
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-04

5.  TPMT genetic variants are associated with increased rejection with azathioprine use in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jackson J Liang; Jennifer R Geske; Barry A Boilson; Robert P Frantz; Brooks S Edwards; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Walter K Kremers; Richard M Weinshilboum; Naveen L Pereira
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetic determinants of mercaptopurine disposition in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Tiphaine Adam de Beaumais; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Luc J J Derijks; Dennis R Wong; Daniel W Hommes; Adriaan A van Bodegraven
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Scorpion primer PCR analysis for genotyping of allele variants of thiopurine s‑methyltransferase*3.

Authors:  Pu Yao; Xue-Mei Qu; Sai Ren; Xiao-Dong Ren; Ning Su; Na Zhao; Liu Wang; Lin Cheng; Bang-Bi Weng; Feng-Jun Sun; Qing Huang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.952

9.  Gene expression and thioguanine nucleotide disposition in acute lymphoblastic leukemia after in vivo mercaptopurine treatment.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zaza; Meyling Cheok; Wenjian Yang; John C Panetta; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling; William E Evans
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Pharmacogenetics during standardised initiation of thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  U Hindorf; M Lindqvist; C Peterson; P Söderkvist; M Ström; H Hjortswang; A Pousette; S Almer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.