Literature DB >> 11478770

The AH receptor of the most dioxin-sensitive species, guinea pig, is highly homologous to the human AH receptor.

M Korkalainen1, J Tuomisto, R Pohjanvirta.   

Abstract

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) brings about a wide spectrum of toxic and biochemical changes, most of which are mediated by the AH receptor (AHR). Recent cloning of the AHR from the two most TCDD-resistant laboratory animals, Han/Wistar (Kuopio) rats and hamsters, suggested a critical role for the C-terminal transactivation domain structure in TCDD sensitivity. Here we cloned the AHR from the most TCDD-susceptible species, guinea pig. The N-terminus of its AHR was highly similar to that in the resistant animals. However, the C-terminal Q-rich subdomain was only about half the size of this subunit in the hamster AHR. There was a distinct correlation across published mammalian species between the number of glutamine residues in the Q-rich subdomain and sensitivity to the acute lethality of TCDD. The closest homolog of the Guinea pig receptor turned out to be the human AHR, which may be relevant for dioxin risk assessment. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11478770     DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  The comparative toxicogenomics database: a cross-species resource for building chemical-gene interaction networks.

Authors:  Carolyn J Mattingly; Michael C Rosenstein; Allan Peter Davis; Glenn T Colby; John N Forrest; James L Boyer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Transgenic Humanized AHR Mouse Reveals Differences between Human and Mouse AHR Ligand Selectivity.

Authors:  Colin A Flaveny; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-01

4.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-mediated reporter gene expression systems in transgenic tobacco plants.

Authors:  Susumu Kodama; Kumiko Okada; Hideyuki Inui; Hideo Ohkawa
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Distinct response to dioxin in an arylhydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-humanized mouse.

Authors:  Takashi Moriguchi; Hozumi Motohashi; Tomonori Hosoya; Osamu Nakajima; Satoru Takahashi; Seiichiroh Ohsako; Yasunobu Aoki; Noriko Nishimura; Chiharu Tohyama; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Colin A Flaveny; Iain A Murray; Chris R Chiaro; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling by cotton balls used for environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Shelley A Tischkau; Motoko Mukai
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 8.  A critique of the European Commission document, "State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters".

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Julie E Goodman; Warren G Foster; Christopher J Borgert; Glen Van Der Kraak
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 9.  Gene-environment interactions in male reproductive health: special reference to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathway.

Authors:  Leon J S Brokken; Yvonne Lundberg Giwercman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Species-Specific Differences in Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Responses: How and Why?

Authors:  Xiaoting Xu; Xi Zhang; Yuzhu Yuan; Yongrui Zhao; Hamza M Fares; Mengjiao Yang; Qing Wen; Reham Taha; Lixin Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.