Literature DB >> 11477441

A comparison of toxicity following two different doses of cyclophosphamide for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 116 multiple myeloma patients.

O Fitoussi1, V Perreau, J M Boiron, E Bouzigon, P Cony-Makhoul, A Pigneux, P Agape, F Nicolini, B Dazey, J Reiffers, R Salmi, G Marit.   

Abstract

High-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) has been shown to be an effective regimen for collecting PBPC in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but the optimal dose to be used remains controversial. Two historical cohorts of MM patients who received G- or GM-CSF and HDC at the dose of either 7 g/m(2) (HDC7, n = 74) or 4 g/m (HDC4, n = 42) were compared. As patients in the HDC4 group were more likely to have received G-CSF than GM-CSF (P < 10(-3)) and fewer previous alkylating agents (P = 0.004), multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. In the HDC4 group, patients had a shorter median duration of neutropenia (P < 10(-4)), fewer RBC (P < 10(-3)) and platelet transfusions (P < 10(-3)) with fewer patients with platelets <20 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.004). Moreover, fewer febrile episodes (P < 10(-3)) and less need of intravenous antibiotics (P < 10(-3)) were found in the HDC4 group. No statistical difference was observed with regard to CD34(+) cell collection efficiency. Thus, the use of HDC at the dose of 4 g/m(2) for the collection of PBPC in MM patients decreases hematological and extrahematological toxicity with an equivalent CD34(+) cell collection efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11477441     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  15 in total

1.  Early measurement of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment predicts later CD34+ mobilisation failure and is a possible criterion for guiding "on demand" use of plerixafor.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milone; Giovanni Tripepi; Massimo Martino; Flavia Ancora; Benedetta Bartolozzi; Andrea Spadaro; Chiara Nozzoli; Alessia La Fauci; Irene Amico; Salvatore Leotta; Massimo Poidomani; Giuseppe Irrera; Pasquale Iacopino; Riccardo Saccardi; Stefano Guidi; Alberto Bosi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Comparison of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide for successful stem cell mobilization in myeloma patients.

Authors:  Nils Winkelmann; Max Desole; Inken Hilgendorf; Thomas Ernst; Herbert G Sayer; Christa Kunert; Lars-Olof Mügge; Andreas Hochhaus; Sebastian Scholl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.

Authors:  A Antar; Z K Otrock; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; H A Ghaddara; N Kreidieh; R Mahfouz; A Bazarbachi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Role of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Phase II trial of high-dose topotecan, melphalan and CY with autologous stem cell support for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S M A Kazmi; R M Saliba; M Donato; M Wang; C Hosing; S Qureshi; P Anderlini; U Popat; R E Champlin; S A Giralt; M H Qazilbash
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Safety and efficacy of upfront plerixafor + G-CSF versus placebo + G-CSF for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients ≥60 and <60 years of age with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Ivana N Micallef; Patrick J Stiff; Edward A Stadtmauer; Brian J Bolwell; Auayporn P Nademanee; Richard T Maziarz; Angela M Partisano; Sachin Marulkar; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.047

7.  Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sascha A Tuchman; Wendi A Bacon; Li-Wen Huang; Gwynn Long; David Rizzieri; Mitchell Horwitz; John P Chute; Keith Sullivan; Ashley Morris Engemann; Amanda Yopp; Zhiguo Li; Kelly Corbet; Nelson Chao; Cristina Gasparetto
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  Improved progression-free and event-free survival in myeloma patients undergoing PBSCH receiving a cyclophosphamide + G-CSF regimen than G-CSF alone.

Authors:  Akira Tanimura; Risen Hirai; Miki Nakamura; Masataka Takeshita; Shotaro Hagiwara; Akiyoshi Miwa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Advances in stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Rusudan K Hopman; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  New strategies for stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Roberto M Lemoli
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.