Literature DB >> 11477349

Risk factors for renal allograft survival from pediatric cadaver donors: an analysis of united network for organ sharing data.

B A Bresnahan1, M A McBride, W S Cherikh, S Hariharan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric donors for kidney transplantation has prompted many centers to use cadaver kidneys from pediatric donors. Use of kidneys from pediatric donors has been shown to have a lower graft survival.
METHODS: Recipients receiving cadaver kidneys from pediatric and adult donors between 1988 and 1995 were analyzed. The data were obtained from United Network of Organ Sharing database. The actuarial kidney transplant graft survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify various risk factors for 1-year graft failure. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated for various risk factors.
RESULTS: Kidney transplant survival rates for donor age <18 years (n=12,838) at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 81.5%, 76.3%, 71.3%, 66.4%, and 61.7%, respectively. The corresponding results for adult donors from age 18 to 50 years (n=35, 442) were 83.5%, 78.4%, 73.1%, 67.9%, and 62.4%, respectively, Log-rank test P<0.01. Pediatric donors were further divided into three groups according to donor age: group I (0-5 years), group II (6-11 years), and group III (12-17 years). The actuarial survival rates for 1, 3, and 5 years for group I (n=2198) were 73.6%, 63.3%, and 55.6%, respectively. The corresponding values for group II (n=2873) were 78.0%, 67.5%, and 57.8% and for group III (n=7767) were 85%, 75.0%, and 64.8%, respectively, P<0.01. Although the recipients of group I had lower graft survival, en bloc grafts (n=751) had much better 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates (76.3%, 67.7%, and 60.7%, respectively) compared with single grafts (n=1447; 72.2%, 61.1%, and 53.2%, P=0.02) from donors 0 to 5 years. Graft thrombosis as a cause of graft failure was seen in 10% of group I compared with 6% in group II and 5% in group III. In group I, lower OR were seen when an en bloc transplant was performed (0.688, P<0.01) and when donor body weight was>15 kg (0.547, P<0.01). However, OR were elevated in recipients of previous transplants (1.556, P<0.01), with prolonged cold ischemic time (1.097, P=0.03), for black recipients (1.288, P=0.03), and for recipients with body mass index> or =25 (1.286, P=0.02). Progressive increase in the donor age was associated with lower OR in group II (0.894, P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: (1) Overall, poorer graft survival was seen in pediatric donor transplants, (2) transplant kidney survival with en bloc kidneys was better than a single kidney from donors 0-5 years, (3) progressive increase in donor age was associated with improved graft survival when the donors were 6-11 years, whereas progressive increase in donor weight was associated with improved graft survival when the donors were 0-5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11477349     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200107270-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  15 in total

Review 1.  Renal transplantation.

Authors:  Peter A Andrews
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-02

2.  Optimising utilisation of kidneys from very young deceased donors: the technique of en bloc kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Ziting Wang; Hui Kim Yap; Krishnan Prabhakaran; Ho Yee Tiong
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Does graft mass impact on pediatric kidney transplant outcomes?

Authors:  Luciana de Santis Feltran; Paulo Cesar Koch Nogueira; Sergio Aron Ajzen; Carlos Gustavo Yuji Verrastro; Alvaro Pacheco-Silva
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Young for young! Mandatory age-matched exchange of paediatric kidneys.

Authors:  Lars Pape; Jochen H H Ehrich; Gisela Offner
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Single vs dual (en bloc) kidney transplants from donors ≤ 5 years of age: A single center experience.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Shraideh; Umar Farooq; Hany El-Hennawy; Alan C Farney; Amudha Palanisamy; Jeffrey Rogers; Giuseppe Orlando; Muhammad Khan; Amber Reeves-Daniel; William Doares; Scott Kaczmorski; Michael D Gautreaux; Samy S Iskandar; Gloria Hairston; Elizabeth Brim; Margaret Mangus; Robert J Stratta
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-24

6.  Encouraging outcomes of using a small-donor single graft in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Luciana de Santis Feltran; Camila Penteado Genzani; Fernando Hamamoto; Mariana Janiques Barcia Magalhaes Fonseca; Maria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo; Nara Léia Gelle de Oliveira; Fabio Cabral de Freitas Amaral; Jose Carlos Baptista; Paulo Cesar Koch Nogueira
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Long-term outcome of adults who undergo transplantation with single pediatric kidneys: how young is too young?

Authors:  Rubin Zhang; Anil Paramesh; Sandy Florman; C Lillian Yau; Saravanan Balamuthusamy; N Kevin Krane; Douglas Slakey
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Kidney transplantation and donation in children.

Authors:  Ernest van Heurn; Eva E de Vries
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  En bloc kidney transplant from an 18-month-old donor to an adult recipient: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  B Patrice Mwipatayi; Chee Weng Leong; Pradeep Subramanian; Alarick Picardo
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-28

10.  25 years of live related renal transplantation in children: The Buenos Aires experience.

Authors:  Eduardo Ruiz; Jorge Ferraris
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.