Literature DB >> 17143628

Young for young! Mandatory age-matched exchange of paediatric kidneys.

Lars Pape, Jochen H H Ehrich, Gisela Offner.   

Abstract

Some allocation systems include a mandatory donation of paediatric kidneys to children, others do not. Both approaches have medical and organisational advantages and disadvantages for adults and children. This article discusses why "young for young" is the best allocation system for children. Primary age-matched kidney allocation to children is one important factor leading to: (1) higher long-term glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) and graft survival and, thereby, to lesser need for dialysis; (2) better psychosocial rehabilitation, growth and development of children and, last but not least, (3) likely increase of the donor pool. As a consequence, health care costs will be reduced for children with end-stage renal failure. The chance of adults receiving an adequate kidney would be only minimally reduced by this policy. Therefore, we recommend an age-matched allocation programme giving children with end- stage kidney diseases a better prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17143628     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-006-0350-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  12 in total

1.  Three-year experience with the new Eurotransplant kidney allocation system 1996-1999.

Authors:  G G Persijn; J Smits; J De Meester; U Frei
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2001 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United Network for Organ Sharing.

Authors:  M M Sarwal; J M Cecka; M T Millan; O Salvatierra
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Organ allocation in pediatric transplantation in France.

Authors:  C Loirat; Y Chalem; J L Golmard
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Paediatric kidney transplantation in small children-- a single centre experience.

Authors:  Thomas Becker; Michael Neipp; Benedikt Reichart; Lars Pape; Jochen Ehrich; Jürgen Klempnauer; Gisela Offner
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Superior long-term graft function and better growth of grafts in children receiving kidneys from paediatric compared with adult donors.

Authors:  L Pape; J Hoppe; T Becker; J H H Ehrich; M Neipp; T Ahlenstiel; G Offner
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Pediatric transplantation in the United States, 1995-2004.

Authors:  S C Sweet; H-H Wong; S A Webber; S Horslen; M K Guidinger; R N Fine; J C Magee
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Better long-term functional adaptation to the child's size with pediatric compared to adult kidney donors.

Authors:  Laurence Dubourg; Pierre Cochat; Aoumeur Hadj-Aïssa; Gunnar Tydén; Ulla B Berg
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  The use of single pediatric cadaver kidneys for transplantation.

Authors:  J M Hayes; A C Novick; S B Streem; E E Hodge; P N Bretan; D Graneto; D R Steinmuller
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  The effect of donor age on graft survival in pediatric cadaver renal transplant recipients--a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study.

Authors:  W E Harmon; S R Alexander; A Tejani; D Stablein
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Graft thrombosis in pediatric renal transplant recipients. A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study.

Authors:  W E Harmon; D Stablein; S R Alexander; A Tejani
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does graft mass impact on pediatric kidney transplant outcomes?

Authors:  Luciana de Santis Feltran; Paulo Cesar Koch Nogueira; Sergio Aron Ajzen; Carlos Gustavo Yuji Verrastro; Alvaro Pacheco-Silva
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Development and validation of a new statistical model for prognosis of long-term graft function after pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Lars Pape; Thurid Ahlenstiel; Christin D Werner; Antonia Zapf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Encouraging outcomes of using a small-donor single graft in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Luciana de Santis Feltran; Camila Penteado Genzani; Fernando Hamamoto; Mariana Janiques Barcia Magalhaes Fonseca; Maria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo; Nara Léia Gelle de Oliveira; Fabio Cabral de Freitas Amaral; Jose Carlos Baptista; Paulo Cesar Koch Nogueira
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Donor-recipient size mismatch in paediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  J Donati-Bourne; H W Roberts; R A Coleman
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2014-02-13

5.  Graft Growth and Podocyte Dedifferentiation in Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch Kidney Transplants.

Authors:  Janina Müller-Deile; Jan Hinrich Bräsen; Marion Pollheimer; Manfred Ratschek; Hermann Haller; Lars Pape; Mario Schiffer
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-09-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.