Literature DB >> 11477306

Regional bone mass measurement from whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan.

M Hammami1, M W Koo, W W Koo, R T Thomas, D Rakhman.   

Abstract

There are no data on the relative accuracy and precision of regional bone mass measurement from whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in small young subjects. Twelve domestic swine piglets (2550-17,660 g) were scanned on a single-beam and on a fan beam densitometer using each humerus and femur as the region of interest to determine the validity of five different scan modes: two infant whole body (IWB), two spine, and one rat whole body (RWB) scan mode in the determination of regional bone mass measurements. DXA bone mineral content (BMC( measurements from RWB and IWB fan beam and IWB single-beam scans were highly predictive of ash weight (adjusted r2 = 0.98, 0.94, 0.94, respectively). Correlation between left and right limbs was highly significant (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) for ash weight (r = 0.99) and for DXA measurements of BMC (r = 0.92-0.99), area (r = 0.92-0.99), and bone mineral density (r = 0.87-0.99) for all modes of DXA scan. Repeatability (as standard deviation of differences of repeated scans) varied with scan mode and DXA parameters and ranged from 1.5 to 7.6%and from 1.8 to 14.7% for intra-and interoperator, respectively. We conclude that regional DXA measurements from IWB and RWB scans can be assessed accurately and with adequate precision for clinical use in subjects with low bone mass comparable with infants and young children. The RWB scan is useful for research studies. However, appropriate training and documentation of precision errors is needed to minimize repeatability errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11477306     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:4:2:131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  4 in total

1.  Osteoporosis assessment by whole body region vs. site-specific DXA.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; Anne C Looker; John A Shepherd; Michael K O'Connor; Sara J Achenbach; B Lawrence Riggs; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Physical Activity Associations with Bone Mineral Density and Modification by Metabolic Traits.

Authors:  Anshu Buttan; Jinrui Cui; Xiuqing Guo; Yii-Der I Chen; Willa A Hsueh; Jerome I Rotter; Mark O Goodarzi
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2020-07-07

3.  Correcting fan-beam magnification in clinical densitometry scans of growing subjects.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Jodi N Dowthwaite; Tamara A Scerpella; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  WHOLE BODY AND REGIONAL BONE MINERAL CONTENT AND DENSITY IN WOMEN AGED 20-75 YEARS.

Authors:  M A Boyanov
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.