B Arrelöv1, L Borgquist, D Ljungberg, K Svärdsudd. 1. Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology and Family Medicine Sections, Uppsala Science Park, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Large differences between physicians in their use of the sickness certification instrument have been described. There are also indications of differences between different categories of physicians, for instance that occupational health physicians and GPs are less generous with certificates of long duration. OBJECTIVES: We therefore decided to test the hypothesis that GPs and occupational health physicians issue more short-term certificates and use partial sick-listing more often than other physicians. METHODS: Certificates for sickness absence during 4 months in 1995 and 2 months in 1996 were collected in eight Swedish counties; a total of 57 563 certificates. From the certificates, a number of variables were extracted. RESULTS: Sickness certificates issued by GPs were on average for a shorter period of time than those issued by other physicians, for the individual certificate as well as for the total sickness period. Occupational health physicians had longer certification periods than GPs but used partial sick-listing more frequently. However, the patients of the various categories of physicians differed regarding age, sex, diagnosis distribution, etc. When the influence of these factors on the duration of the certification periods was taken into account, the GPs still issued significantly shorter periods of sick-leave than the other physicians, followed by the occupational health physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be indicative of a different way of handling the sickness certification instrument among different categories of physicians, especially GPs.
BACKGROUND: Large differences between physicians in their use of the sickness certification instrument have been described. There are also indications of differences between different categories of physicians, for instance that occupational health physicians and GPs are less generous with certificates of long duration. OBJECTIVES: We therefore decided to test the hypothesis that GPs and occupational health physicians issue more short-term certificates and use partial sick-listing more often than other physicians. METHODS: Certificates for sickness absence during 4 months in 1995 and 2 months in 1996 were collected in eight Swedish counties; a total of 57 563 certificates. From the certificates, a number of variables were extracted. RESULTS: Sickness certificates issued by GPs were on average for a shorter period of time than those issued by other physicians, for the individual certificate as well as for the total sickness period. Occupational health physicians had longer certification periods than GPs but used partial sick-listing more frequently. However, the patients of the various categories of physicians differed regarding age, sex, diagnosis distribution, etc. When the influence of these factors on the duration of the certification periods was taken into account, the GPs still issued significantly shorter periods of sick-leave than the other physicians, followed by the occupational health physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be indicative of a different way of handling the sickness certification instrument among different categories of physicians, especially GPs.
Authors: Anna Löfgren; Jan Hagberg; Britt Arrelöv; Sari Ponzer; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Christina Lindholm; Britt Arrelöv; Gunnar Nilsson; Anna Löfgren; Elin Hinas; Ylva Skånér; Anna Ekmer; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Romy Steenbeek; Antonius Jm Schellart; Henny Mulders; Johannes R Anema; Herman Kroneman; Jan Besseling Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-01-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Britt Arrelöv; Kristina Alexanderson; Jan Hagberg; Anna Löfgren; Gunnar Nilsson; Sari Ponzer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 3.295