Literature DB >> 11472894

The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus.

C J Hernandez1, G S Beaupré, T S Keller, D R Carter.   

Abstract

Although bone strength and modulus are known to be influenced by both volume fraction and mineral content (ash fraction), the relative influence of these two parameters remains unknown. Single-parameter power law functions are used widely to relate bone volume or ash fraction to bone strength and elastic modulus. In this study we evaluate the potential for predicting bone mechanical properties with two-parameter power law functions of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and ash fraction (alpha) of the form y = a(BV/TV)(b) alpha(c) (where y is either ultimate strength or elastic modulus). We derived an expression for bone volume fraction as a function of apparent density and ash fraction to perform a new analysis of data presented by Keller in 1994. Exponents b and c for the prediction of bone strength were found to be 1.92 +/- 0.02 and 2.79 +/- 0.09 (mean +/- SE), respectively, with r(2) = 0.97. The value of b was found to be consistent with that found previously, whereas the value of c was lower than values previously reported. For the prediction of elastic modulus we found b and c to be 2.58 +/- 0.02 and 2.74 +/- 0.13, respectively, with r(2) = 0.97. The exponent related to ash fraction was typically larger than that associated with bone volume fraction, suggesting that a change in mineral content will, in general, generate a larger change in bone strength and stiffness than a similar change in bone volume fraction. These findings are important for interpreting the results of antiresorptive drug treatments that can cause changes in both ash and bone volume fraction.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11472894     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00467-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  42 in total

1.  Changes in proximal femur bone properties following ovariectomy and their association with resistance to fracture.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Mário Vaz; Maria Helena Fernandes; Rita Ferreira; Francisco Amado; Maria Paula Mota; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Do regional modifications in tissue mineral content and microscopic mineralization heterogeneity adapt trabecular bone tracts for habitual bending? Analysis in the context of trabecular architecture of deer calcanei.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Alex N Knight; Ryan W Farnsworth; Roy D Bloebaum
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A robust algorithm for thickness computation at low resolution and its application to in vivo trabecular bone CT imaging.

Authors:  Yinxiao Liu; Dakai Jin; Cheng Li; Kathleen F Janz; Trudy L Burns; James C Torner; Steven M Levy; Punam K Saha
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 4.  A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Effects of non-enzymatic glycation on cancellous bone fragility.

Authors:  S Y Tang; U Zeenath; D Vashishth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Age-related factors affecting the postyield energy dissipation of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Anuradha Roy; Jerrod H Tyler; Rae L Acuna; Heather J Gayle; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Sexually Dimorphic Influence of Neonatal Antibiotics on Bone.

Authors:  Matteo M Pusceddu; Patricia J Stokes; Alice Wong; Melanie G Gareau; Damian C Genetos
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Mechanical properties of open-cell foam synthetic thoracic vertebrae.

Authors:  Amy E Johnson; Tony S Keller
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  How can bone turnover modify bone strength independent of bone mass?

Authors:  C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Metabolic and structural bone disturbances induced by hyperlipidic diet in mice treated with simvastatin.

Authors:  Evelise Aline Soares; Rômulo Dias Novaes; Wilson Romero Nakagaki; Geraldo José Medeiros Fernandes; José Antônio Dias Garcia; José Angelo Camilli
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.