Literature DB >> 11471938

Laboratory and field evaluation of predator odors as repellents for kiore (Rattus exulans) and ship rats (R. rattus).

G N Bramley1, J R Waas.   

Abstract

Predator odors may serve to stop rats from entering conservation areas or to decrease predation, food consumption, and other damage by rats in areas tainted with predator odor. We compared the efficacy of real predator odors and synthetic odors (derived from the urine and feces of carnivores) as rat repellents with real herbivore odors as controls in a Y maze. We tested six predator odors: cat (Felis catus) urine and feces, mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) feces, n-propylthietane, S-methyl, methyl butanol, and isopentyl-methyl sulphide. The herbivore odors we used were: red deer (Cervus elaphus) urine, guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) feces, and white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) urine. Ship rats (Rattus rattus) and kiore or Polynesian rats (R. exulans) showed no aversion to any of the six predator odors when compared with herbivore odors. Ship rats, however, may have avoided synthesized odors more than real ones. We applied two odors (S-methyl, methyl butanol and n-propylthietane) to purpose-built feeders in native forest but recorded no change in either visitation rate or duration of visits for rodents [rats and mice (Mus musculus)] or possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). The consumption of maize at feeders was correlated with the number and duration of possum visits, but only weakly correlated with the number of visits by rodents. Consumption of maize was unaffected by the odor associated with the feeder. It is unlikely that the odors we tested will be useful in deterring rodents or possums from areas where they have been removed for economic, public health or conservation reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11471938     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010399322861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  12 in total

1.  How We Smell: The Molecular and Cellular Bases of Olfaction.

Authors:  Patrick Nef
Journal:  News Physiol Sci       Date:  1998-02

2.  Immediate and long-term effects of novel odors on risk assessment in mice.

Authors:  E D Kemble; B L Bolwahnn
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-04

3.  Cover and efficacy of predator-based repellents for Townsend's voleMicrotus townsendii.

Authors:  M Merkens; A S Harestad; T P Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : I. Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; L O Nordstrom; D S Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : II. Black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; L O Nordstrom; D S Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  An evaluation of repellents to suppress browsing by possums.

Authors:  A D Woolhouse; D R Morgan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Strain differences in mouse response to odours of predators.

Authors:  G Dell'Omo; M Fiore; E Alleva
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Effects of altered olfactory experiences on the development of infant rats' responses to odors.

Authors:  L M Terry; I B Johanson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.038

9.  Effect of odor derived from lion faeces on behavior of wild rabbits.

Authors:  B Boag; J A Mlotkiewicz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Why are predator urines aversive to prey?

Authors:  D L Nolte; J R Mason; G Epple; E Aronov; D L Campbell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mice respond differently to urine and its major volatile constituents from male and female ferrets.

Authors:  Jian-Xu Zhang; Lixing Sun; Milos Novotny
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Bigger doesn't mean bolder: behavioral variation of four wild rodent species to novelty and predation risk following a fast-slow continuum.

Authors:  Ian Nicholas Best; Pei-Jen Lee Shaner; Hsuan-Yi Lo; Kurtis Jai-Chyi Pei; Chi-Chien Kuo
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Continuous Exposure to Inorganic Mercury Affects Neurobehavioral and Physiological Parameters in Mice.

Authors:  Hafsa Malqui; Hammou Anarghou; Fatima Zahra Ouardi; Nabila Ouasmi; Mohamed Najimi; Fatiha Chigr
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.444

4.  The olfactory hole-board test in rats: a new paradigm to study aversion and preferences to odors.

Authors:  Kerstin E A Wernecke; Markus Fendt
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Increasing predation risk with light reduces speed, exploration and visit duration of invasive ship rats (Rattus rattus).

Authors:  Bridgette Farnworth; Richard Meitern; John Innes; Joseph R Waas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Are physiological and behavioural responses to stressors displayed concordantly by wild urban rodents?

Authors:  Loren L Fardell; Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez; Christopher R Dickman; Mathew S Crowther; Chris R Pavey; Edward J Narayan
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Volatiles from Plants Induced by Multiple Aphid Attacks Promote Conidial Performance of Lecanicillium lecanii.

Authors:  Yongwen Lin; Mubasher Hussain; Pasco Bruce Avery; Muhammad Qasim; Dalin Fang; Liande Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Wild Norway Rats Do Not Avoid Predator Scents When Collecting Food in a Familiar Habitat: A Field Study.

Authors:  Rafał Stryjek; Berenika Mioduszewska; Ewelina Spaltabaka-Gędek; Grzegorz R Juszczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.