Literature DB >> 11470746

DNA damage-related RNA expression to assess individual sensitivity to ionizing radiation.

K Bishay1, K Ory, M F Olivier, J Lebeau, C Levalois, S Chevillard.   

Abstract

Predictive markers of intrinsic radiosensitivity in healthy individuals are needed in monitoring their occupational or environmental radiation exposure and may predict a patient's response to radiotherapy. Ionizing radiation can induce a large spectrum of DNA lesions, but under optimal DNA repair conditions, the principal residual lesions of importance are misrepaired double-strand breaks. The micronucleus (MN) assay represents a useful test in measuring radiosensitivity since it reflects non-repaired DNA breaks at the time of cell division. Spontaneous and radiation-induced MN vary greatly between individuals, and little is known about the molecular mechanisms of this variability. DNA repair and apoptosis processes are involved in the cellular response to radiation-induced DNA damage, and variation in gene expression related to these cellular pathways could be linked to individual radiosensitivity. In this study we analysed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR the basal expression of 12 genes involved both in DNA repair and apoptosis in a series of blood samples obtained from 32 healthy male donors. Relationships between basal RNA expressions and MN frequency and distribution per bi-nucleated cell were studied after ex vivo irradiation of total blood samples. Our results indicate that the variability of mRNA gene expression among the 32 subjects appears to be of the same magnitude or higher than that found for spontaneous or radiation-induced MN frequency and that RAD51 gene expression is negatively correlated with radiation-induced MN frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470746     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/22.8.1179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  11 in total

1.  Transcription profile of DNA damage response genes at G₀ lymphocytes exposed to gamma radiation.

Authors:  Divyalakshmi Saini; Shridevi Shelke; A Mani Vannan; Sneh Toprani; Vinay Jain; Birajalaxmi Das; M Seshadri
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.

Authors:  M Tubiana; A Aurengo; D Averbeck; R Masse
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Cytogenetic effects of radiation and genetic polymorphisms of the XRCC1 and XRCC3 repair genes in industrial radiographers.

Authors:  Mahsa Shakeri; Farideh Zakeri; Vahid Changizi; Mohammad Reza Rajabpour; Mohammad Reza Farshidpour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) as a model for studying effects of low-dose ionizing radiation: growth inhibition by a single dose.

Authors:  Alexander V Kinev; Vrad Levering; Kenneth Young; Francis Ali-Osman; George A Truskey; Mark W Dewhirst; Dora Il'yasova
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Association between RAD 51 rs1801320 and susceptibility to glioblastoma.

Authors:  S Franceschi; S Tomei; C M Mazzanti; F Lessi; P Aretini; M La Ferla; V De Gregorio; F Pasqualetti; K Zavaglia; G Bevilacqua; A G Naccarato
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Gene expression variability and the analysis of large-scale RNA-seq studies with the MDSeq.

Authors:  Di Ran; Z John Daye
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Rad-by-rad (bit-by-bit): triumph of evidence over activities fostering fear of radiogenic cancers at low doses.

Authors:  J Strzelczyk; W Potter; Z Zdrojewicz
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  No evidence of chromosome damage in children and adolescents with differentiated thyroid carcinoma after receiving 131I radiometabolic therapy, as evaluated by micronucleus assay and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Federico; Giuseppe Boni; Barbara Fabiani; Lisa Fiore; Patrizia Lazzeri; Francesco Massart; Claudio Traino; Carmela Verola; Giuseppe Saggese; Giuliano Mariani; Roberto Scarpato
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Differences in DNA Repair Capacity, Cell Death and Transcriptional Response after Irradiation between a Radiosensitive and a Radioresistant Cell Line.

Authors:  Mireia Borràs-Fresneda; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Maria Gomolka; Sabine Hornhardt; Ute Rössler; Gemma Armengol; Leonardo Barrios
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Ex Vivo Apoptosis in CD8+ Lymphocytes Predicts Rectal Cancer Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Sebastian Winkler; Philipp Hoppe; Marlen Haderlein; Markus Hecht; Rainer Fietkau; Luitpold V Distel
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.