Literature DB >> 28535263

Gene expression variability and the analysis of large-scale RNA-seq studies with the MDSeq.

Di Ran1, Z John Daye2.   

Abstract

Rapidly decreasing cost of next-generation sequencing has led to the recent availability of large-scale RNA-seq data, that empowers the analysis of gene expression variability, in addition to gene expression means. In this paper, we present the MDSeq, based on the coefficient of dispersion, to provide robust and computationally efficient analysis of both gene expression means and variability on RNA-seq counts. The MDSeq utilizes a novel reparametrization of the negative binomial to provide flexible generalized linear models (GLMs) on both the mean and dispersion. We address challenges of analyzing large-scale RNA-seq data via several new developments to provide a comprehensive toolset that models technical excess zeros, identifies outliers efficiently, and evaluates differential expressions at biologically interesting levels. We evaluated performances of the MDSeq using simulated data when the ground truths are known. Results suggest that the MDSeq often outperforms current methods for the analysis of gene expression mean and variability. Moreover, the MDSeq is applied in two real RNA-seq studies, in which we identified functionally relevant genes and gene pathways. Specifically, the analysis of gene expression variability with the MDSeq on the GTEx human brain tissue data has identified pathways associated with common neurodegenerative disorders when gene expression means were conserved.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28535263      PMCID: PMC5737414          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  110 in total

1.  Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-02-12

2.  The landscape of genomic imprinting across diverse adult human tissues.

Authors:  Yael Baran; Meena Subramaniam; Anne Biton; Taru Tukiainen; Emily K Tsang; Manuel A Rivas; Matti Pirinen; Maria Gutierrez-Arcelus; Kevin S Smith; Kim R Kukurba; Rui Zhang; Celeste Eng; Dara G Torgerson; Cydney Urbanek; Jin Billy Li; Jose R Rodriguez-Santana; Esteban G Burchard; Max A Seibold; Daniel G MacArthur; Stephen B Montgomery; Noah A Zaitlen; Tuuli Lappalainen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Differential gene regulation by the two progesterone receptor isoforms in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Jennifer K Richer; Britta M Jacobsen; Nicole G Manning; M Greg Abel; Douglas M Wolf; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses.

Authors:  Ruijie Liu; Aliaksei Z Holik; Shian Su; Natasha Jansz; Kelan Chen; Huei San Leong; Marnie E Blewitt; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Gordon K Smyth; Matthew E Ritchie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Lobar brain hemorrhages and white matter changes: Clinical, radiological and laboratorial profiles.

Authors:  Luís F Maia; Cristiana Vasconcelos; Susana Seixas; Rui Magalhães; Manuel Correia
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 6.  Transient cell-cell interactions in neural circuit formation.

Authors:  Daniel L Chao; Le Ma; Kang Shen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Rank-rank hypergeometric overlap: identification of statistically significant overlap between gene-expression signatures.

Authors:  Seema B Plaisier; Richard Taschereau; Justin A Wong; Thomas G Graeber
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Genomic analysis of QTLs and genes altering natural variation in stochastic noise.

Authors:  Jose M Jimenez-Gomez; Jason A Corwin; Bindu Joseph; Julin N Maloof; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  A resampling-based meta-analysis for detection of differential gene expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Bala Gur-Dedeoglu; Ozlen Konu; Serkan Kir; Ahmet Rasit Ozturk; Betul Bozkurt; Gulusan Ergul; Isik G Yulug
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Genetic interactions affecting human gene expression identified by variance association mapping.

Authors:  Andrew Anand Brown; Alfonso Buil; Ana Viñuela; Tuuli Lappalainen; Hou-Feng Zheng; J Brent Richards; Kerrin S Small; Timothy D Spector; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  11 in total

1.  Developmental Programming: Prenatal Testosterone Excess on Liver and Muscle Coding and Noncoding RNA in Female Sheep.

Authors:  Nadia Saadat; Muraly Puttabyatappa; Venkateswaran R Elangovan; John Dou; Joseph N Ciarelli; Robert C Thompson; Kelly M Bakulski; Vasantha Padmanabhan
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  The pseudogenes of eukaryotic translation elongation factors (EEFs): Role in cancer and other human diseases.

Authors:  Luigi Cristiano
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  Identification of differentially distributed gene expression and distinct sets of cancer-related genes identified by changes in mean and variability.

Authors:  Aedan G K Roberts; Daniel R Catchpoole; Paul J Kennedy
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  Male increase in brain gene expression variability is linked to genetic risk for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Junfang Chen; Han Cao; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Emanuel Schwarz
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  EHMT2 suppresses the variation of transcriptional switches in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Tie-Bo Zeng; Nicholas Pierce; Ji Liao; Purnima Singh; Kin Lau; Wanding Zhou; Piroska E Szabó
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Addressing variability in iPSC-derived models of human disease: guidelines to promote reproducibility.

Authors:  Viola Volpato; Caleb Webber
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.758

7.  Co-expression network analysis predicts a key role of microRNAs in the adaptation of the porcine skeletal muscle to nutrient supply.

Authors:  Emilio Mármol-Sánchez; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Raquel Quintanilla; Tainã Figueiredo Cardoso; Rayner González-Prendes; Joan Tibau; Marcel Amills
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-17

8.  Extensive fragmentation and re-organization of transcription in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Vasilis F Ntasis; Nikolaos I Panousis; Maria G Tektonidou; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Dimitrios T Boumpas; George K Bertsias; Christoforos Nikolaou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Predictive features of gene expression variation reveal mechanistic link with differential expression.

Authors:  Olga M Sigalova; Amirreza Shaeiri; Mattia Forneris; Eileen Em Furlong; Judith B Zaugg
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Coordinated analysis of exon and intron data reveals novel differential gene expression changes.

Authors:  Hamid R Eghbalnia; William W Wilfinger; Karol Mackey; Piotr Chomczynski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.