Literature DB >> 11470720

Cognitive restraint can be offset by distraction, leading to increased meal intake in women.

F Bellisle1, A M Dalix.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive restraint, a stable disposition to limit food intake, can be assessed by questionnaires, but there is no quantitative, objective measure of its effect.
OBJECTIVE: The goal was to provide an objective measure of the intake-limiting effects of cognitive restraint by testing meal intake under conditions intended to minimize or accentuate restraint.
DESIGN: Healthy women (n = 41; aged 35 +/- 9 y; body mass index, in kg/m2: 21.3 +/- 1.9) participated in once-weekly laboratory lunch tests under 4 conditions: condition 1, subjects ate alone (baseline); condition 2, subjects ate alone while listening to recorded instructions focusing on the sensory characteristics of the foods (attention); condition 3, subjects ate alone while listening to a recorded detective story (distraction); and condition 4, a group of 4 subjects had lunch together. On all occasions, the same foods were presented and ingested ad libitum. The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was filled out after the series of 4 meals was completed.
RESULTS: Meal size was significantly higher in the distraction condition than at baseline (by 301 +/- 26 kJ; P < 0.001). The difference in energy intake between the baseline and distraction conditions significantly correlated with factor 1 (cognitive restraint) of the TFEQ (r = 0.51, P < 0.01) and with total score (r = 0.32, P < 0.05) but not with disinhibition or hunger. For each additional point on factor 1, meal size increased by 50 kJ under the distraction condition compared with baseline. The group eating condition induced no increase in meal size.
CONCLUSION: Cognitive restraint exerts a quantifiable limiting effect on intake at meal times and this effect can be offset by cognitive distraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470720     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/74.2.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  19 in total

Review 1.  Shared and unique mechanisms underlying binge eating disorder and addictive disorders.

Authors:  Erica M Schulte; Carlos M Grilo; Ashley N Gearhardt
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-02-04

2.  Recognizing disordered eating in primary care patients with obesity.

Authors:  Sara A Chacko; Sarah N Chiodi; Christina C Wee
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  Nutrition standards for away-from-home foods in the USA.

Authors:  D A Cohen; R Bhatia
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 9.213

4.  Triggers of eating in everyday life.

Authors:  A Janet Tomiyama; Traci Mann; Lisa Comer
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 5.  Eating attentively: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of food intake memory and awareness on eating.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Paul Aveyard; Amanda Daley; Kate Jolly; Amanda Lewis; Deborah Lycett; Suzanne Higgs
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Time use choices and healthy body weight: a multivariate analysis of data from the American Time Use Survey.

Authors:  Cathleen D Zick; Robert B Stevens; W Keith Bryant
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Eating up cognitive resources: Does attentional consumption lead to food consumption?

Authors:  Sarah Volz; Andrew Ward; Traci Mann
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.016

8.  Does listening to the sound of yourself chewing increase your enjoyment of food?

Authors:  Kirsty E Amos; Shahram Anari; Charlotte A Buswell; Emma J McNeill; Athanasia Printza; Stephen J Ray; Isam Rustom
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 9.  Expected Satiety: Application to Weight Management and Understanding Energy Selection in Humans.

Authors:  Ciarán G Forde; Eva Almiron-Roig; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

10.  Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Catriona M M Lakemond; Rene A de Wijk; Pieternel A Luning; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.