Literature DB >> 33609586

Eating up cognitive resources: Does attentional consumption lead to food consumption?

Sarah Volz1, Andrew Ward2, Traci Mann3.   

Abstract

What is the role played by attentional load in eating? Does attending to an unrelated task generally lead to overeating, perhaps by preventing individuals from focusing on a goal to limit consumption? Or does such attentional diversion typically lead to reductions in eating, perhaps by preventing people from noticing tempting features of relevant food cues? Past research has supported each of these two propositions, but comparisons between existing studies have been hampered to the extent that various experimental manipulations differ in the degree to which they occupy attention, as well as differing in the particular type of attentional resources they exploit. To resolve existing discrepancies in the literature, in a series of studies, we made use of a working memory manipulation, the n-back task (Kirchner, 1958), that can be systematically modified to induce varying levels of cognitive load, allowing for rigorous comparisons of the effects of different levels of attentional load on eating. These studies revealed a complex pattern of results. Analysis of findings from three studies employing within-subjects designs documented a linear relationship, in that participants consumed less food when completing a higher cognitive-load task than when completing a lower cognitive-load task. Three studies employing between-subjects designs highlighted a less consistent pattern of results, but when combined in a mini-meta-analysis, suggested the opposite linear relationship, with participants assigned to higher cognitive-load conditions generally consuming more food than participants assigned to lower cognitive-load conditions. We conducted two additional studies to reconcile these conflicting patterns of data. Neither finding received unequivocal support, although both studies found that participants ate less when engaged in higher cognitive-load tasks than lower cognitive-load tasks. The precise nature of the relationship between attentional load and eating remains elusive.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Eating; Self-regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33609586      PMCID: PMC8058276          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   5.016


  37 in total

1.  Don't mind if I do: disinhibited eating under cognitive load.

Authors:  A Ward; T Mann
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-04

2.  Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information.

Authors:  W K KIRCHNER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-04

3.  Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?

Authors:  Tania B Huedo-Medina; Julio Sánchez-Meca; Fulgencio Marín-Martínez; Juan Botella
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-06

Review 4.  Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory.

Authors:  E E Smith; J Jonides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Influence of dietary restraint and environmental factors on meal size in normal-weight women. A laboratory study.

Authors:  France Bellisle; Anne-Marie Dalix; Gheorghe Airinei; Serge Hercberg; Sandrine Péneau
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Leaving a flat taste in your mouth: task load reduces taste perception.

Authors:  Reine C van der Wal; Lotte F van Dillen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-30

7.  Cognitive Load Alters Neuronal Processing of Food Odors.

Authors:  Sonja Maria Hoffmann-Hensel; Rik Sijben; Rea Rodriguez-Raecke; Jessica Freiherr
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Evaluation and treatment of smell dysfunction.

Authors:  T M Davidson; A Jalowayski; C Murphy; R D Jacobs
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-04

9.  Television and eating: repetition enhances food intake.

Authors:  Utsa Mathur; Richard J Stevenson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-03

10.  Cognitive Distraction at Mealtime Decreases Amount Consumed in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Crossover Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Carli A Liguori; Cassandra J Nikolaus; Sharon M Nickols-Richardson
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  1 in total

1.  "Sound" Decisions: The Combined Role of Ambient Noise and Cognitive Regulation on the Neurophysiology of Food Cravings.

Authors:  Danni Peng-Li; Patricia Alves Da Mota; Camile Maria Costa Correa; Raymond C K Chan; Derek Victor Byrne; Qian Janice Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.