Literature DB >> 11469987

Outlet Dysfunction Constipation.

Arnold Wald1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of outlet dysfunction constipation in patients with idiopathic constipation that responds poorly or not at all to conservative measures, such as fiber supplements, fluids, and stimulant laxatives, is based upon diagnostic testing. These tests include colonic transit of radio-opaque markers, anorectal manometry or electromyography, barium defecography, and expulsion of a water-filled balloon. The literature suggests that conditions such as pelvic floor dyssynergia exist but may be over-diagnosed as a laboratory artifact. In our laboratory, we screen patients with balloon expulsion studies, and then test for dyssynergia only if the result of the balloon expulsion test is abnormal. In my opinion, anal sphincter electromyogram and manometry are equivalent in establishing the diagnosis. Barium defecography is helpful in making a diagnosis of a rectocele, but I prefer to document that vaginal pressure on the rectocele significantly improves rectal evacuation. Manometry also helps to establish the presence of megarectum, hypotonia, and weak expulsion efforts. Conceptually, biofeedback training, which incorporates simulated defecation, is the most logical approach to pelvic floor dyssynergia. It incurs no risk and benefits 60% to 80% of patients. The drawbacks are the time-intensive nature of the therapy and the short-term costs, which are offset if there is sustained benefit. There is no evidence that biofeedback is helpful in children with constipation. Habit training has established benefits, but recurrences are frequent and long-term reinforcement is helpful to maintain success. Laxatives and enemas are adjunctive therapies in both habit training and biofeedback. Surgery is effective in those uncommon patients with physiologically significant rectoceles, but surgical division of the puborectalis muscle is risky and unproven. Likewise, botulinum toxin injection into the puborectalis is unproven, but the effects are rarely permanent should incontinence occur. Diagnostic measures and therapeutic success are enhanced when patients are seen in centers experienced with the evaluation of these disorders.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11469987     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-001-0054-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  13 in total

Review 1.  Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment.

Authors:  G S Duthie; D C Bartolo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Paradoxical sphincter contraction is rarely indicative of anismus.

Authors:  W A Voderholzer; D A Neuhaus; A G Klauser; K Tzavella; S A Müller-Lissner; N E Schindlbeck
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Treatment of anismus in intractable constipation with botulinum A toxin.

Authors:  R I Hallan; N S Williams; J Melling; D J Waldron; N R Womack; J F Morrison
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-09-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Biofeedback training in disordered defecation. A critical review.

Authors:  P Enck
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a comparison of two methods.

Authors:  G Bleijenberg; H C Kuijpers
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation.

Authors:  S S Rao; K D Welcher; R E Pelsang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Biofeedback for intractable rectal pain: outcome and predictors of success.

Authors:  R Gilliland; J S Heymen; D F Altomare; D Vickers; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  R N van der Plas; M A Benninga; H A Büller; P M Bossuyt; L M Akkermans; W K Redekop; J A Taminiau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-09-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation.

Authors:  E Chiotakakou-Faliakou; M A Kamm; A J Roy; J B Storrie; I C Turner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Controlled randomised trial of visual biofeedback versus muscle training without a visual display for intractable constipation.

Authors:  D Koutsomanis; J E Lennard-Jones; A J Roy; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  6 in total

1.  Resting anal pressure, not outlet obstruction or transit, predicts healthcare utilization in chronic constipation: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  K Staller; K Barshop; B Kuo; A N Ananthakrishnan
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Is-it possible to distinguish irritable bowel syndrome with constipation from functional constipation?

Authors:  M Bouchoucha; G Devroede; C Bon; B Bejou; F Mary; R Benamouzig
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Pelvic outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Orit Kaidar-Person; Seth A Rosen; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

4.  Slow-transit Constipation.

Authors:  Adil E. Bharucha; Sidney F. Philips
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-08

5.  Results in the long-term course after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR).

Authors:  Katrin Köhler; Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Dirk Lehmann; Thomas Jackisch; Bernhard Fankhänel; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Slow Transit Constipation.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.