Literature DB >> 11467903

Quantifying head motion associated with motor tasks used in fMRI.

E Seto1, G Sela, W E McIlroy, S E Black, W R Staines, M J Bronskill, A R McIntosh, S J Graham.   

Abstract

In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, long experiment times and small intensity changes associated with brain activation frequently lead to image artifacts due to head motion. Methods to minimize and correct for head motion by restraint, fast imaging, and retrospective image registration are typically combined but do not completely solve the problem, particularly for specific patient populations. As an initial step toward optimizing future designs of head restraints and improving motion correction techniques, the head motion characteristics of groups of stroke subjects, age-matched controls, and young adults were investigated with the aid of an MR simulator and a highly accurate position tracking system. Position measurements were recorded during motor tasks involving either the hand or the foot. Head motion was strongly dependent on the subject group and less upon the task conditions based on ANOVA calculations (P < 0.05). The stroke subjects exhibited approximately twice the head motion compared to that of age-matched controls, and the latter's head motion was about twice that of young adults. Moreover, the range of head motion in stroke subjects over all tasks was approximately 2 +/- 1 mm, with the motion occurring predominantly as translation in the superior-inferior direction and pitch rotation (nodding). These results lead to several recommendations on the design of fMRI motor experiments and suggest that improved motion correction strategies are required to examine such patient populations comprehensively. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11467903     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  Brain activation during oral exercises used for dysphagia rehabilitation in healthy human subjects: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Emiko Ogura; Miwa Matsuyama; Tazuko K Goto; Yuko Nakamura; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Exercise for Parkinsonian Individuals With Freezing of Gait.

Authors:  Carla Silva-Batista; Andrea Cristina de Lima-Pardini; Mariana Penteado Nucci; Daniel Boari Coelho; Alana Batista; Maria Elisa Pimentel Piemonte; Egberto Reis Barbosa; Luis Augusto Teixeira; Daniel M Corcos; Edson Amaro; Fay B Horak; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  Age-related changes in the functional neuroanatomy of overt speech production.

Authors:  Peter Sörös; Arpita Bose; Lisa Guttman Sokoloff; Simon J Graham; Donald T Stuss
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Developmental Trajectory of Beta Cortical Oscillatory Activity During a Knee Motor Task.

Authors:  Max J Kurz; Amy L Proskovec; James E Gehringer; Katherine M Becker; David J Arpin; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Evaluation of different cerebrospinal fluid and white matter fMRI filtering strategies-Quantifying noise removal and neural signal preservation.

Authors:  Marek Bartoň; Radek Mareček; Lenka Krajčovičová; Tomáš Slavíček; Tomáš Kašpárek; Petra Zemánková; Pavel Říha; Michal Mikl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Functional imaging of motor recovery after stroke: remaining challenges.

Authors:  John W Krakauer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging movers and shakers: does subject-movement cause sampling bias?

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; Helen Genova; John DeLuca; Nancy Chiaravalloti; James F Sumowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Ann Firestine; Michele West; Kaveh Saremi; Roger Woods
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  fMRI-Compatible Registration of Jaw Movements Using a Fiber-Optic Bend Sensor.

Authors:  Peter Sörös; Bradley J Macintosh; Fred Tam; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.