Literature DB >> 11467030

PHLS overview of communicable diseases 1999.

P Horby1, A Rushdy, C Graham, M O'Mahony.   

Abstract

Every other year since 1995 the Public Health Laboratory Service has undertaken a consultation exercise to identify communicable diseases of high public health priority. The purpose of identifying disease priorities is to guide rational and transparent service planning and resource allocation. Also, the process aims to ensure a customer sensitive service. This paper presents the results of the priority setting exercise undertaken in 1999. A postal questionnaire was sent to 1130 key professionals involved in communicable disease control in the United Kingdom. Respondents were asked to assess the relative priority of 61 communicable diseases and to identify priority areas of work associated with these diseases. Five criteria were used to assess relative priority. The five criteria were; present burden of ill-health, social and economic impact, potential threat to health, health gain opportunity and public concern and confidence. For each disease, respondents were asked to score the importance of each criterion. Forty six percent of participants (518/1130) returned completed questionnaires. There was no significant difference in response rate by professional group. Based on the scores assigned to each of the five criteria, the relative priority of 61 communicable diseases has been established. The top ten diseases in descending order of priority are, HIV/AIDS, meningococcal diseases, Chlamydia trachomatis, influenza, tuberculosis, E. coli O157, Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, salmonellosis, transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and Helicobacter pylori. The opinion of a large number of health care professionals has been used to establish a priority rank for a wide range of communicable diseases. This work provides planners and policy makers with a synthesis of current professional opinion that can be used as a foundation for making decisions on service developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11467030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health        ISSN: 1462-1843


  9 in total

1.  How can infectious diseases be prioritized in public health? A standardized prioritization scheme for discussion.

Authors:  Gérard Krause
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  A stakeholder-informed approach to the identification of criteria for the prioritization of zoonoses in Canada.

Authors:  Victoria Ng; Jan M Sargeant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A quantitative approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: a health professionals' perspective.

Authors:  Victoria Ng; Jan M Sargeant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multi-criteria decision analysis tools for prioritising emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases associated with climate change in Canada.

Authors:  Ruth Cox; Javier Sanchez; Crawford W Revie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Weighting of Criteria for Disease Prioritization Using Conjoint Analysis and Based on Health Professional and Student Opinion.

Authors:  Nadine Stebler; Gertraud Schuepbach-Regula; Peter Braam; Laura Cristina Falzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  World Health Organization Methodology to Prioritize Emerging Infectious Diseases in Need of Research and Development.

Authors:  Massinissa Si Mehand; Piers Millett; Farah Al-Shorbaji; Cathy Roth; Marie Paule Kieny; Bernadette Murgue
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Prioritizing Zoonotic Diseases: Differences in Perspectives Between Human and Animal Health Professionals in North America.

Authors:  V Ng; J M Sargeant
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.702

8.  The use of expert opinion to assess the risk of emergence or re-emergence of infectious diseases in Canada associated with climate change.

Authors:  Ruth Cox; Crawford W Revie; Javier Sanchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A quantitative and novel approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: a public perspective.

Authors:  Victoria Ng; Jan M Sargeant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.