PURPOSE: To assess differences in surface energy due to processing induced disorder and to understand whether the disorder dominated the surfaces of particles. METHODS: Inverse gas chromatography was used to compare the surface energies of crystalline, amorphous, and ball milled lactose. RESULTS: The milling process made ca 1% of the lactose amorphous, however the dispersive contribution to surface energy was 31.2, 37.1, and 41.6 mJ m(-2) for crystalline, spray dried and milled lactose, respectively. A physical mixture of crystalline (99%) and amorphous (1%) material had a dispersive surface energy of 31.5 mJ m(-2). CONCLUSION: Milling had made the surface energy similar to that of the amorphous material in a manner that was very different to a physical mixture of the same amorphous content. The milled material will have similar interfacial interactions to the 100% amorphous material.
PURPOSE: To assess differences in surface energy due to processing induced disorder and to understand whether the disorder dominated the surfaces of particles. METHODS: Inverse gas chromatography was used to compare the surface energies of crystalline, amorphous, and ball milled lactose. RESULTS: The milling process made ca 1% of the lactose amorphous, however the dispersive contribution to surface energy was 31.2, 37.1, and 41.6 mJ m(-2) for crystalline, spray dried and milled lactose, respectively. A physical mixture of crystalline (99%) and amorphous (1%) material had a dispersive surface energy of 31.5 mJ m(-2). CONCLUSION: Milling had made the surface energy similar to that of the amorphous material in a manner that was very different to a physical mixture of the same amorphous content. The milled material will have similar interfacial interactions to the 100% amorphous material.