Literature DB >> 11463731

Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?

C Marris1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11463731      PMCID： PMC1083956          DOI： 10.1093/embo-reports/kve142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Genetically modified crops: hope for developing countries? The current GM debate widely ignores the specific problems of farmers and consumers in the developing world.

Authors:  L Herrera-Estrella; A Alvarez-Morales
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  From the test tube to the table. Public perception of GM crops and how to overcome the public mistrust of biotechnology in food production.

Authors:  R Marchant
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.807
  2 in total
  14 in total

1.  Genetically modified abominations? Widespread opposition to GMOs might have deep-seated cultural causes.

Authors:  Jakub Kwieciński
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Towards a richer debate on tissue engineering: a consideration on the basis of NEST-ethics.

Authors:  A J M Oerlemans; M E C van Hoek; E van Leeuwen; S van der Burg; W J M Dekkers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Team science for science communication.

Authors:  Gabrielle Wong-Parodi; Benjamin H Strauss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science.

Authors:  Karen Kastenhofer; Jan C Schmidt
Journal:  Poiesis Prax       Date:  2011-11-30

5.  Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Maize Resistant to Diabrotica spp.: Influence on Above-Ground Arthropods in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Zdeňka Svobodová; Oxana Skoková Habuštová; William D Hutchison; Hany M Hussein; František Sehnal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Experiences in Engaging the Public on Biotechnology Advances and Regulation.

Authors:  M Megan Quinlan; Joe Smith; Raymond Layton; Paul Keese; Ma Lorelie U Agbagala; Merle B Palacpac; Louise Ball
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-02

7.  Sowing the seeds of skepticism: Russian state news and anti-GMO sentiment.

Authors:  Shawn F Dorius; Carolyn J Lawrence-Dill
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.074

8.  Negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge: The case of dual use and synthetic biology.

Authors:  Claire Marris; Catherine Jefferson; Filippa Lentzos
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2014-11

9.  Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union.

Authors:  Dennis Eriksson; Sevasti Chatzopoulou
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

10.  Assessing Public Opinion on CRISPR-Cas9: Combining Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Martin Müller; Manuel Schneider; Marcel Salathé; Effy Vayena
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.428
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.