Literature DB >> 11463627

U-type inactivation of Kv3.1 and Shaker potassium channels.

K G Klemic1, G E Kirsch, S W Jones.   

Abstract

We previously concluded that the Kv2.1 K(+) channel inactivates preferentially from partially activated closed states. We report here that the Kv3.1 channel also exhibits two key features of this inactivation mechanism: a U-shaped voltage dependence measured at 10 s and stronger inactivation with repetitive pulses than with a single long depolarization. More surprisingly, slow inactivation of the Kv1 Shaker K(+) channel (Shaker B Delta 6--46) also has a U-shaped voltage dependence for 10-s depolarizations. The time and voltage dependence of recovery from inactivation reveals two distinct components for Shaker. Strong depolarizations favor inactivation that is reduced by K(o)(+) or by partial block by TEA(o), as previously reported for slow inactivation of Shaker. However, depolarizations near 0 mV favor inactivation that recovers rapidly, with strong voltage dependence (as for Kv2.1 and 3.1). The fraction of channels that recover rapidly is increased in TEA(o) or high K(o)(+). We introduce the term U-type inactivation for the mechanism that is dominant in Kv2.1 and Kv3.1. U-type inactivation also makes a major but previously unrecognized contribution to slow inactivation of Shaker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11463627      PMCID: PMC1301555          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75743-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  43 in total

1.  Two types of inactivation in Shaker K+ channels: effects of alterations in the carboxy-terminal region.

Authors:  T Hoshi; W N Zagotta; R W Aldrich
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Tetraethylammonium blockade distinguishes two inactivation mechanisms in voltage-activated K+ channels.

Authors:  K L Choi; R W Aldrich; G Yellen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Na+ channels must deactivate to recover from inactivation.

Authors:  C C Kuo; B P Bean
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  State-dependent inactivation of the alpha1G T-type calcium channel.

Authors:  J R Serrano; E Perez-Reyes; S W Jones
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Inactivation determined by a single site in K+ pores.

Authors:  M De Biasi; H A Hartmann; J A Drewe; M Taglialatela; A M Brown; G E Kirsch
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Voltage clamping of Xenopus laevis oocytes utilizing agarose-cushion electrodes.

Authors:  W Schreibmayer; H A Lester; N Dascal
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Characterization of a Shaw-related potassium channel family in rat brain.

Authors:  J Rettig; F Wunder; M Stocker; R Lichtinghagen; F Mastiaux; S Beckh; W Kues; P Pedarzani; K H Schröter; J P Ruppersberg
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Shaker potassium channel gating. III: Evaluation of kinetic models for activation.

Authors:  W N Zagotta; T Hoshi; R W Aldrich
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Voltage-dependent gating of Shaker A-type potassium channels in Drosophila muscle.

Authors:  W N Zagotta; R W Aldrich
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Shaker potassium channel gating. I: Transitions near the open state.

Authors:  T Hoshi; W N Zagotta; R W Aldrich
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  41 in total

1.  Two components of voltage-dependent inactivation in Ca(v)1.2 channels revealed by its gating currents.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ferreira; Eduardo Ríos; Nicolás Reyes
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Calcium channels: unanswered questions.

Authors:  Stephen W Jones
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Kinetic analysis of the effects of H+ or Ni2+ on Kv1.5 current shows that both ions enhance slow inactivation and induce resting inactivation.

Authors:  Yen May Cheng; David Fedida; Steven J Kehl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Mechanisms of closed-state inactivation in voltage-gated ion channels.

Authors:  Robert Bähring; Manuel Covarrubias
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  A model of the interaction between N-type and C-type inactivation in Kv1.4 channels.

Authors:  Glenna C L Bett; Isidore Dinga-Madou; Qinlian Zhou; Vladimir E Bondarenko; Randall L Rasmusson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Structural correlates of selectivity and inactivation in potassium channels.

Authors:  Jason G McCoy; Crina M Nimigean
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-16

7.  Slow inactivation in voltage gated potassium channels is insensitive to the binding of pore occluding peptide toxins.

Authors:  Carolina Oliva; Vivian González; David Naranjo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Separation of P/C- and U-type inactivation pathways in Kv1.5 potassium channels.

Authors:  Harley T Kurata; Kyle W Doerksen; Jodene R Eldstrom; Saman Rezazadeh; David Fedida
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Mechanism of the modulation of Kv4:KChIP-1 channels by external K+.

Authors:  Yu A Kaulin; J A De Santiago-Castillo; C A Rocha; M Covarrubias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  A direct demonstration of closed-state inactivation of K+ channels at low pH.

Authors:  Thomas W Claydon; Moni Vaid; Saman Rezazadeh; Daniel C H Kwan; Steven J Kehl; David Fedida
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.