Literature DB >> 11462098

Is sacral instrumentation mandatory to address pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular thoracolumbar scoliosis due to myelomeningocele?

A Wild1, H Haak, M Kumar, R Krauspe.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional outcome of two-stage anterior and posterior instrumented fusion without fixation to the sacrum on 11 patients with neuromuscular scoliosis from thoracolumbar myelomeningocele. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To our knowledge, there are no published results of combined anterior and posterior correction and fusion without inclusion of the sacrum in neuromuscular scoliosis from thoracolumbar myelomeningocele. In this article we present our experience and critically evaluate the functional outcome on 11 patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1995, 11 consecutive patients with severe thoracolumbar scoliosis were admitted at our hospital. The mean age at operation was 12 years 9 months (range 9 years 9 months to 14 years 6 months). All patients underwent a two-stage anterior and posterior spinal reconstruction. The patients were evaluated before surgery and after surgery.
RESULTS: All patients were observed for a mean of 4 years 11 months (range 42-88 months) from the time of second stage procedure. Before treatment the mean scoliosis was 81 degrees (range 55-110 degrees ); this was reduced to a mean of 31 degrees (range 8-70 degrees ), and at the final follow-up the correction had deteriorated slightly to a mean of 35 degrees (range 12-80 degrees ). No patient had increased neurologic deficit or showed other major complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic obliquity in thoracolumbar neuromuscular scoliosis from lumbosacral myelomeningocele spontaneously corrected when the scoliotic deformity is adequately addressed with instrumented fusion without inclusion of the sacrum. The correction obtained remained stable at follow-up. In the absence of a control group we believe that sparing lumbar segments from primary fusion offers these patients a better freedom of mobility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11462098     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Can the caudal extent of fusion in the surgical treatment of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy be stopped at lumbar 5?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Makihito Okamoto; Takashi Masaki; Hirotsugu Okamoto; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Kazuhiro Ishii; Yasuhiro Ueda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The "T-construct" for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular spinal deformities. Preliminary results of a prospective series of 15 patients.

Authors:  Rédoine Zahi; Camille Thévenin-Lemoine; Amélie Rogier; Barbara Constantinou; Pierre Mary; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Is there a role for selective anterior instrumentation in neuromuscular scoliosis?

Authors:  Devi Prakash Tokala; Khai S Lam; Brian J C Freeman; John K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Evaluation of pelvic fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis: a retrospective study in 55 patients.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung Woo Suh; Hae-Ryong Song; Jae Hyuk Yang; Nirmal Jajodia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.