Literature DB >> 11461037

LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time.

D Kee1, W Karwowski.   

Abstract

This paper presents a technique for postural loading on the upper body assessment (LUBA). The proposed method is based on the new experimental data for composite index of perceived discomfort (ratio values) for a set of joint motions, including the hand, arm, neck and back, and the corresponding maximum holding times in static postures. Twenty male subjects participated in the experiment designed to measure perceived joint discomforts. The free modulus technique of the magnitude estimation method was employed to obtain subjects' discomforts for varying joint motions. The developed postural classification scheme was based on the angular deviation levels from the neutral position for each joint motion. These were divided into groups with the same degree of discomforts based on the statistical analysis. Each group was assigned a numerical discomfort score relative to the perceived discomfort value of elbow flexion, which exhibited the lowest level among all joint motions investigated in this study, and, therefore, was set as a reference point. The criteria for evaluating stresses of working postures were proposed based on the four distinct action categories, in order to enable practitioners to apply appropriate corrective actions. The proposed scheme can be used for evaluating and redesigning static working postures in industry.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11461037     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(01)00006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  13 in total

1.  Relationships between maximum holding time and ratings of pain and exertion differ for static and dynamic tasks.

Authors:  Laura A Frey Law; Jennifer E Lee; Tara R McMullen; Ting Xia
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) - evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  André Klussmann; Ulf Steinberg; Falk Liebers; Hansjürgen Gebhardt; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Evaluation of musculoskeletal workload of manual operating tasks using a hydraulic jack based on ergonomic postural analysis and electromyography: A case study of non-professional young male users.

Authors:  Atsushi Sugama; Takahiro Nishimura; Kouki Doi; Shigenobu Shimada; Manabu Chikai; Kiyohiko Nunokawa; Shuichi Ino
Journal:  Work       Date:  2022

4.  Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol.

Authors:  Andre Klussmann; Falk Liebers; Felix Brandstädt; Marianne Schust; Patrick Serafin; Andreas Schäfer; Hansjürgen Gebhardt; Bernd Hartmann; Ulf Steinberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Evaluating the utility of two gestural discomfort evaluation methods.

Authors:  Minseok Son; Jaemoon Jung; Woojin Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Forestry: A Comparison between RULA and REBA in the Manual Feeding of a Wood-Chipper.

Authors:  Margherita Micheletti Cremasco; Ambra Giustetto; Federica Caffaro; Andrea Colantoni; Eugenio Cavallo; Stefano Grigolato
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Mechanical Energy Expenditure-based Comfort Evaluation Model for Gesture Interaction.

Authors:  Wenjie Wang; Xiansheng Qin; Chen Zheng; Hongbo Wang; Jing Li; Junlong Niu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-30

8.  Classification of Whole-Body Postural Discomfort Using Cluster Analysis.

Authors:  Jaejin Hwang; Kyung-Sun Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Comparison of risk assessment procedures used in OCRA and ULRA methods.

Authors:  Danuta Roman-Liu; Anna Groborz; Tomasz Tokarski
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Comparing the Effectiveness of Three Ergonomic Risk Assessment Methods-RULA, LUBA, and NERPA-to Predict the Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Saeid Yazdanirad; Amir Hossein Khoshakhlagh; Ehsanollah Habibi; Asma Zare; Mohammad Zeinodini; Fatemeh Dehghani
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.