Literature DB >> 11459937

Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.

L Lindström1, R V Alatalo, A Lyytinen, J Mappes.   

Abstract

The evolution of aposematism, a phenomenon where prey species conspicuously advertise their unprofitability to predators, is puzzling. How did conspicuousness evolve, if it simultaneously increased the likelihood of an inexperienced predator to detect the prey and presumably kill it? Antiapostatic selection, where rare prey is predated relatively more often, is considered as another major difficulty for aposematism to evolve. However, the risk of being conspicuous in low frequencies has not been experimentally tested. We designed an experiment to test how frequency (4%, 12%, 32%) of conspicuous aposematic prey and its dispersion type (solitary vs. aggregated) affect an initial predation risk of the prey and in avoidance learning of predators. Wild great tits (Parus major) were predators on artificial prey in a "novel world." The relative mortality of aposematic prey was antiapostatic, thus the frequency-dependent predation was most severe at low frequencies. In all frequencies, aggregated aposematic prey survived better than solitary prey. Surprisingly, learning was not determined by a fixed number of unpalatable prey eaten, but at low frequencies fewer aposematic individuals eaten generated predators' avoidance learning. However, per-capita risk for the prey remained highest at low frequencies. Our results underscore the problems of initial evolution of rare conspicuous morphs. Aggregated prey suffered less from predation, indicating selective advantage of aggregation over solitary living for a conspicuous individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459937      PMCID: PMC55394          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161071598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Does prey dispersion affect frequency-dependent predation by wild birds?

Authors:  Stuart C Church; Michael Jowers; John A Allen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.

Authors:  Birgitta Sillén-Tullberg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry.

Authors:  D D Kapan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration.

Authors:  J A Endler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-07-06       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Frequency-dependent selection by predators.

Authors:  J A Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-07-06       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Did aggregation favour the initial evolution of warning coloration? A novel world revisited.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

  6 in total
  32 in total

1.  Mimicry: an interface between psychology and evolution.

Authors:  J Mallet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism.

Authors:  Gregory A Sword
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The aerodynamic costs of warning signals in palatable mimetic butterflies and their distasteful models.

Authors:  Robert B Srygley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The importance of pattern similarity between Müllerian mimics in predator avoidance learning.

Authors:  Candy Rowe; Leena Lindström; Anne Lyytinen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  When more is less: the fitness consequences of predators attacking more unpalatable prey when more are presented.

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland; Elizabeth Wiley; Graeme D Ruxton; Johanna Mappes; Michael P Speed
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Mimics without models: causes and consequences of allopatry in Batesian mimicry complexes.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A within-species warning function for an aposematic signal.

Authors:  Daniel R Papaj; Ginny M Newsom
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva.

Authors:  Birgitta S Tullberg; Sami Merilaita; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evidence for a Müllerian mimetic radiation in Asian pitvipers.

Authors:  K L Sanders; A Malhotra; R S Thorpe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Artificial neural networks and the study of evolution of prey coloration.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.