Literature DB >> 11459681

Determinants of pain in needle electromyography.

J A Strommen1, J R Daube.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although previous literature has attempted to characterize patients' pain during electromyography (EMG) based on the size and type of needle used, none have assessed the relationship between the needle insertion technique and pain.
METHODS: The effects of needle type and needle movement within muscle on the immediate and residual pain during needle EMG were measured in a double-blind study of 48 patients with diverse clinical problems but no sensory loss.
RESULTS: The results demonstrate that when using a standard insertion technique characterized by large needle movement, the monopolar needles were less painful than concentric needle electrodes. However, when using small needle movements (1 mm or less), pain associated with concentric needles was significantly reduced with no difference between the needle types. Examiner experience, gender, previous EMG, reported pain tolerance, pain on nerve conduction studies and other factors did not predict the amount of pain. The type of needle and type of needle movement did not effect the sensitivity of identifying abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings would support the hypothesis that although a monopolar needle electrode is less painful when using a standard technique, the needle-handling technique, specifically small needle movements, plays a large role in determining pain when using concentric needle electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459681     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00552-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  8 in total

1.  Expected and Experienced Pain Levels in Electromyography.

Authors:  Pınar Yalinay Dikmen; Elif Ilgaz Aydinlar; Geysu Karlikaya
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 1.339

2.  Patient perception of pain versus observed pain behavior during a standardized electrodiagnostic test.

Authors:  Josh Verson; Andrew J Haig; Danielle Sandella; Karen S J Yamakawa; Zachary London; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  No difference in postoperative pain after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Gerald Williams; Matthew J Kraeutler; Benjamin Zmistowski; John M Fenlin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Factors influencing aversion to specific electrodiagnostic studies.

Authors:  Nivedita U Jerath; Scott B Strader; Chandan G Reddy; Andrea Swenson; Jun Kimura; Edward Aul
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Biarticular muscles are most responsive to upper-body pitch perturbations in human standing.

Authors:  Christian Schumacher; Andrew Berry; Daniel Lemus; Christian Rode; André Seyfarth; Heike Vallery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Next-Generation Wearable Biosensors Developed with Flexible Bio-Chips.

Authors:  Dahyun Nam; Jae Min Cha; Kiwon Park
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  The provision of written information and its effect on levels of pain and anxiety during electrodiagnostic studies: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yan Ling Lai; Annemarie Van Heuven; Adeniyi Borire; Tejaswi Kandula; James G Colebatch; Arun V Krishnan; William Huynh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Activity Evaluation of Facial Muscles by Surface Electromyography.

Authors:  Nicolò Bertozzi; Bernardo Bianchi; Luana Salvagni; Edoardo Raposio
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.