Literature DB >> 11459163

Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens).

J Call1.   

Abstract

Juvenile and adult orangutans (n = 5; Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (n = 7; Pan troglodytes), and 19- and 26-month-old children (n = 24; Homo sapiens) received visible and invisible displacements. Three containers were presented forming a straight line, and a small box was used to displace a reward under them. Subjects received 3 types of displacement: single (the box visited 1 container), double adjacent (the box visited 2 contiguous containers), and double nonadjacent (the box visited 2 noncontiguous containers). All species performed at comparable levels, solving all problems except the invisible nonadjacent displacements. Visible displacements were easier than invisible, and single were easier than double displacements. In a 2nd experiment, subjects saw the baiting of either 2 adjacent or 2 nonadjacent containers with no displacements. All species selected the empty container more often when the baited containers were nonadjacent than when they were adjacent. It is hypothesized that a response bias and inhibition problem were responsible for the poor performance in nonadjacent displacements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459163     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  18 in total

1.  Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Double invisible displacement understanding in orangutans: testing in non-locomotor and locomotor space.

Authors:  Suma Mallavarapu; Tara S Stoinski; Bonnie M Perdue; Terry L Maple
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Comparing physical and social cognitive skills in macaque species with different degrees of social tolerance.

Authors:  Marine Joly; Jérôme Micheletta; Arianna De Marco; Jan A Langermans; Elisabeth H M Sterck; Bridget M Waller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use markers to monitor the movement of a hidden item.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Mary M Beran; Charles R Menzel
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Ontogeny of object permanence in a non-storing corvid species, the jackdaw (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Dorottya Júlia Ujfalussy; Ádám Miklósi; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Object permanence in dogs: invisible displacement in a rotation task.

Authors:  Holly C Miller; Cassie D Gipson; Aubrey Vaughan; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

7.  Spatial rotations and transpositions in orangutans ( Pongo pygmaeus) and chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Josep Call
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 2.163

8.  The evolution of primate visual self-recognition: evidence of absence in lesser apes.

Authors:  Thomas Suddendorf; Emma Collier-Baker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Rotational displacement skills in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Kelly D Hughes; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  The use of a displacement device negatively affects the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) in visible object displacement tasks.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Stefanie Riemer; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.