Literature DB >> 11457104

Theoretical study of electron, proton, and proton-coupled electron transfer in iron bi-imidazoline complexes.

N Iordanova1, H Decornez, S Hammes-Schiffer.   

Abstract

A comparative theoretical investigation of single electron transfer (ET), single proton transfer (PT), and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions in iron bi-imidazoline complexes is presented. These calculations are motivated by experimental studies showing that the rates of ET and PCET are similar and are both slower than the rate of PT for these systems (Roth, J. P.; Lovel, S.; Mayer, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5486). The theoretical calculations are based on a multistate continuum theory, in which the solute is described by a multistate valence bond model, the transferring hydrogen nucleus is treated quantum mechanically, and the solvent is represented as a dielectric continuum. For electronically nonadiabatic electron transfer, the rate expressions for ET and PCET depend on the inner-sphere (solute) and outer-sphere (solvent) reorganization energies and on the electronic coupling, which is averaged over the reactant and product proton vibrational wave functions for PCET. The small overlap of the proton vibrational wave functions localized on opposite sides of the proton transfer interface decreases the coupling for PCET relative to ET. The theory accurately reproduces the experimentally measured rates and deuterium kinetic isotope effects for ET and PCET. The calculations indicate that the similarity of the rates for ET and PCET is due mainly to the compensation of the smaller outer-sphere solvent reorganization energy for PCET by the larger coupling for ET. The moderate kinetic isotope effect for PCET arises from the relatively short proton transfer distance. The PT reaction is found to be dominated by solute reorganization (with very small solvent reorganization energy) and to be electronically adiabatic, leading to a fundamentally different mechanism that accounts for the faster rate.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11457104     DOI: 10.1021/ja0100524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  13 in total

1.  Probing quantum and dynamic effects in concerted proton-electron transfer reactions of phenol-base compounds.

Authors:  Todd F Markle; Adam L Tenderholt; James M Mayer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 2.  Theory of coupled electron and proton transfer reactions.

Authors:  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer; Alexei A Stuchebrukhov
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  A Simple Marcus-Theory Type Model for Hydrogen Atom Transfer/Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer.

Authors:  James M Mayer
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.475

Review 4.  Biochemistry and theory of proton-coupled electron transfer.

Authors:  Agostino Migliore; Nicholas F Polizzi; Michael J Therien; David N Beratan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Do Spin State and Spin Density Affect Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reactivity?

Authors:  Caroline T Saouma; James M Mayer
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Low Reorganization Energy for Electron Self-Exchange by a Formally Copper(III,II) Redox Couple.

Authors:  Timothy J Zerk; Caroline T Saouma; James M Mayer; William B Tolman
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Multiple-site concerted proton-electron transfer reactions of hydrogen-bonded phenols are nonadiabatic and well described by semiclassical Marcus theory.

Authors:  Joel N Schrauben; Mauricio Cattaneo; Thomas C Day; Adam L Tenderholt; James M Mayer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Slow hydrogen atom transfer reactions of oxo- and hydroxo-vanadium compounds: the importance of intrinsic barriers.

Authors:  Christopher R Waidmann; Xin Zhou; Erin A Tsai; Werner Kaminsky; David A Hrovat; Weston Thatcher Borden; James M Mayer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Theoretical analysis of the unusual temperature dependence of the kinetic isotope effect in quinol oxidation.

Authors:  Michelle K Ludlow; Alexander V Soudackov; Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Hydrogen atom transfer reactions of a ruthenium imidazole complex: hydrogen tunneling and the applicability of the Marcus cross relation.

Authors:  Adam Wu; James M Mayer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.