Literature DB >> 11456318

Confusing selective feeding with differential digestion in bacterivorous nanoflagellates.

J Boenigk1, A C Matz, K Jurgens, H Arndt.   

Abstract

Food selectivity and the mechanisms of food selection were analyzed by video microscopy for three species (Spumella, Ochromonas, Cafeteria) of interception-feeding heterotrophic nanoflagellates. The fate of individual prey particles, either live bacteria and/or inert particles, was recorded during the different stages of the particle-flagellate-interaction, which included capture, ingestion, digestion, and egestion. The experiments revealed species-specific differences and new insights into the underlying mechanisms of particle selection by bacterivorous flagellates. When beads and bacteria were offered simultaneously, both particles were ingested unselectively at similar rates. However, the chrysomonads Spumella and Ochromonas egested the inert beads after a vacuole passage time of only 2-3 min, which resulted in an increasing proportion of bacteria in the food vacuoles. Vacuole passage time for starved flagellates was significantly longer compared to that of exponential-phase flagellates for Spumella and Ochromonas. The bicosoecid Cafeteria stored all ingested particles, beads as well as bacteria, in food vacuoles for more then 30 min. Therefore "selective digestion" is one main mechanism responsible for differential processing of prey particles. This selection mechanism may explain some discrepancies of former experiments using inert particles as bacterial surrogates for measuring bacterivory.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11456318     DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2001.tb00175.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol        ISSN: 1066-5234            Impact factor:   3.346


  14 in total

1.  Impact of protozoan grazing on bacterial community structure in soil microcosms.

Authors:  Regin Rønn; Allison E McCaig; Bryan S Griffiths; James I Prosser
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Successful predation of filamentous bacteria by a nanoflagellate challenges current models of flagellate bacterivory.

Authors:  Qinglong L Wu; Jens Boenigk; Martin W Hahn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Biomagnification of cadmium selenide quantum dots in a simple experimental microbial food chain.

Authors:  R Werlin; J H Priester; R E Mielke; S Krämer; S Jackson; P K Stoimenov; G D Stucky; G N Cherr; E Orias; P A Holden
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Prey food quality affects flagellate ingestion rates.

Authors:  S Paul Shannon; Thomas H Chrzanowski; James P Grover
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 5.  The need to account for cell biology in characterizing predatory mixotrophs in aquatic environments.

Authors:  Susanne Wilken; Charmaine C M Yung; Maria Hamilton; Kenneth Hoadley; Juliana Nzongo; Charlotte Eckmann; Maria Corrochano-Luque; Camille Poirier; Alexandra Z Worden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Differential Response of Cafeteria roenbergensis to Different Bacterial and Archaeal Prey Characteristics.

Authors:  Daniele De Corte; Gabriela Paredes; Taichi Yokokawa; Eva Sintes; Gerhard J Herndl
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Differential growth of and nanoscale TiO₂ accumulation in Tetrahymena thermophila by direct feeding versus trophic transfer from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Randall E Mielke; John H Priester; Rebecca A Werlin; Jeff Gelb; Allison M Horst; Eduardo Orias; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Feeding characteristics of an amoeba (Lobosea: Naegleria) grazing upon cyanobacteria: food selection, ingestion and digestion progress.

Authors:  Liu Xinyao; Shi Miao; Liao Yonghong; Gao Yin; Zhang Zhongkai; Wen Donghui; Wu Weizhong; An Chencai
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Predator/prey interaction between Pfiesteria piscicida and Rhodomonas mediated by a marine alpha proteobacterium.

Authors:  M R Alavi
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Biotic interactions and sunlight affect persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and microbial source tracking genetic markers in the upper Mississippi river.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Orin C Shanks; Mano Sivaganesan; G Shay Fout; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.