Literature DB >> 11454614

Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach.

N Takebayashi1, P L Morrell.   

Abstract

G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11454614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  66 in total

1.  Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Dichogamy correlates with outcrossing rate and defines the selfing syndrome in the mixed-mating genus Collinsia.

Authors:  Susan Kalisz; April Randle; David Chaiffetz; Melisa Faigeles; Aileen Butera; Craig Beight
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Reproductive isolation during domestication.

Authors:  Hannes Dempewolf; Kathryn A Hodgins; Sonja E Rummell; Norman C Ellstrand; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion: I. Mutation load and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The compounding effects of high pollen limitation, selfing rates and inbreeding depression leave a New Zealand tree with few viable offspring.

Authors:  Megan L Van Etten; Jennifer A Tate; Sandra H Anderson; Dave Kelly; Jenny J Ladley; Merilyn F Merrett; Paul G Peterson; Alastair W Robertson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Transitions between self-compatibility and self-incompatibility and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the large and diverse tropical genus Dendrobium (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Fabio Pinheiro; Donata Cafasso; Salvatore Cozzolino; Giovanni Scopece
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin; Eric Bazin; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Mating systems and the efficacy of selection at the molecular level.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Effects of mating system on adaptive potential for leaf morphology in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Stefan Andersson; Jones K Ofori
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  The pollination niche and its role in the diversification and maintenance of the southern African flora.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.