PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of social desirability trait, the tendency to respond in a manner consistent with societal expectations, on self-reported fruit, vegetable, and macronutrient intake. METHODS: A 61-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), 7-item fruit and vegetable screener, and a single question on combined fruit and vegetable intake were completed by 132 female employees at five health centers in eastern Massachusetts. Intake of fruit and vegetables derived from all three methods and macronutrients from the FFQ were fit as dependent variables in multiple linear regression models (overall and by race/ethnicity and education); independent variables included 3-day mean intakes derived from 24-hour recalls (24HR) and score on the 33-point Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale (the regression coefficient for which reflects its effect on estimates of dietary intake based on the comparison method relative to 24HR). RESULTS: Results are based on the 93 women with complete data and FFQ-derived caloric intake between 450 and 4500 kcal/day. In women with college education, FFQ-derived estimates of total caloric were associated with under-reporting by social desirability trait (e.g., the regression coefficient for total caloric intake was -23.6 kcal/day/point in that group versus 36.1 kcal/day/point in women with education less than college) (difference = 59.7 kcal/day/point, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 13.2, 106.2). Except for the single question on which women with college education tended to under-report (difference =.103 servings/day/point, 95% CI = 0.003, 0.203), there was no association of social desirability trait with self-reported fruit and vegetable intake. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of social desirability trait on FFQ reports of macronutrient intake appeared to differ by education, but not by ethnicity or race. The results of this study may have important implications for epidemiologic studies of diet and health in women.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of social desirability trait, the tendency to respond in a manner consistent with societal expectations, on self-reported fruit, vegetable, and macronutrient intake. METHODS: A 61-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), 7-item fruit and vegetable screener, and a single question on combined fruit and vegetable intake were completed by 132 female employees at five health centers in eastern Massachusetts. Intake of fruit and vegetables derived from all three methods and macronutrients from the FFQ were fit as dependent variables in multiple linear regression models (overall and by race/ethnicity and education); independent variables included 3-day mean intakes derived from 24-hour recalls (24HR) and score on the 33-point Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale (the regression coefficient for which reflects its effect on estimates of dietary intake based on the comparison method relative to 24HR). RESULTS: Results are based on the 93 women with complete data and FFQ-derived caloric intake between 450 and 4500 kcal/day. In women with college education, FFQ-derived estimates of total caloric were associated with under-reporting by social desirability trait (e.g., the regression coefficient for total caloric intake was -23.6 kcal/day/point in that group versus 36.1 kcal/day/point in women with education less than college) (difference = 59.7 kcal/day/point, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 13.2, 106.2). Except for the single question on which women with college education tended to under-report (difference =.103 servings/day/point, 95% CI = 0.003, 0.203), there was no association of social desirability trait with self-reported fruit and vegetable intake. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of social desirability trait on FFQ reports of macronutrient intake appeared to differ by education, but not by ethnicity or race. The results of this study may have important implications for epidemiologic studies of diet and health in women.
Authors: Amy F Subar; Laurence S Freedman; Janet A Tooze; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Carol Boushey; Marian L Neuhouser; Frances E Thompson; Nancy Potischman; Patricia M Guenther; Valerie Tarasuk; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Penny A Ralston; Jennifer L Lemacks; Kandauda K A S Wickrama; Iris Young-Clark; Catherine Coccia; Jasminka Z Ilich; Cynthia M Harris; Celeste B Hart; Arrie M Battle; Catherine Walker O'Neal Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Swann Arp Adams; Charles E Matthews; Cara B Ebbeling; Charity G Moore; Joan E Cunningham; Jeanette Fulton; James R Hebert Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Marian L Fitzgibbon; Melinda R Stolley; Pamela Ganschow; Linda Schiffer; Anita Wells; Nolanna Simon; Alan Dyer Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: B Olendzki; E Procter-Gray; M F Magee; G Youssef; K Kane; L Churchill; J Ockene; W Li Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Tamara Dubowitz; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Dolores Acevedo-Garcia; S V Subramanian; Karen E Peterson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-08-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Pamela Williams-Piehota; Amy E Latimer; Nicole A Katulak; Ashley Cox; Stephanie A N Silvera; Linda Mowad; Peter Salovey Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.045