Literature DB >> 11454117

Death at home following a targeted advance-care planning process at home: the kitchen table discussion.

E Ratner1, L Norlander, K McSteen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether home health agency patients' preferences to die at home can be honored following a structured, professionally facilitated advance-care planning (ACP) process provided in the home.
DESIGN: A case series of patients who were identified by their home health agency nurses as having a life-limiting illness and then referred for social service assessment, followed for at least 6 months, with median follow-up of 191 days.
SETTING: A large, urban, home health agency owned by a not-for-profit integrated healthcare system. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four adult patients (median age 75, range 37-94) receiving home care services other than hospice. INTERVENTION: Formally structured social work visits at patients' homes to discuss end-of-life issues, with communication of results to home health nurses and attending physicians. Social workers performed standard psychosocial assessments, obtained patient and family preferences regarding end-of-life care, and provided education about hospice services. MEASUREMENTS: Acceptance of the ACP process, preferences for location of end-of-life care, location of care at the end of life, adequacy of timing of intervention as measured by length of life after ACP, and use of hospice services.
RESULTS: Eighty-three of 84 participants (99%) were willing to complete an ACP process in the home setting. Of the 54 patients expressing a clear preference for location of end-of-life care, 46 (82%) wanted this care to be at home. Thirty-nine (46%) of the participants died within 90 days of ACP; 58 (69%) died by the end of the study. Forty-three (75%) of these deaths occurred at home or in a hospice residence. Fifty-one (61%) patients used home, residential, or nursing home-based hospice services during the study.
CONCLUSION: In this series of seriously ill home health patients, most preferred to die at home and virtually all were willing to participate in a home-based ACP process. Facilitating ACP among such patients and their families was associated with end-of-life care at home. Use of hospice services was common following ACP in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11454117     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49155.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  17 in total

1.  Room for improvement: An examination of advance care planning documentation among gynecologic oncology patients.

Authors:  Alaina J Brown; Megan Johnson Shen; Diana Urbauer; Jolyn Taylor; Patricia A Parker; Cindy Carmack; Lauren Prescott; Elizabeth Kolawole; Carly Rosemore; Charlotte Sun; Lois Ramondetta; Diane C Bodurka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  An assessment of social diffusion in the Respecting Choices advance care planning program.

Authors:  Sara M Moorman; Deborah Carr; Karin T Kirchhoff; Bernard J Hammes
Journal:  Death Stud       Date:  2012-04

3.  An examination of Latino advanced cancer patients' and their informal caregivers' preferences for communication about advance care planning: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Megan Johnson Shen; Cyndi Gonzalez; Benjamin Leach; Paul K Maciejewski; Elissa Kozlov; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2020-06

Review 4.  Exploring the Uptake of Advance Care Planning in Older Adults: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Erica Frechman; Mary S Dietrich; Rachel Lane Walden; Cathy A Maxwell
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Predictors of Place of Death of Individuals in a Home-Based Primary and Palliative Care Program.

Authors:  Phoebe G Prioleau; Tacara N Soones; Katherine Ornstein; Meng Zhang; Cardinale B Smith; Ania Wajnberg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life.

Authors:  JoAnne Alissi Cosgriff; Margaret Pisani; Elizabeth H Bradley; John R O'Leary; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Impact of end-of-life discussions on the reduction of Latino/non-Latino disparities in do-not-resuscitate order completion.

Authors:  Megan Johnson Shen; Holly G Prigerson; Elizabeth Paulk; Kelly M Trevino; Frank J Penedo; Ana I Tergas; Andrew S Epstein; Alfred I Neugut; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Improving goal-concordant care in the hospital for patients with dementia in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Blair P Golden; Hillary D Lum; Christine D Jones
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.899

9.  Current advance care planning practice in the Australian community: an online survey of home care package case managers and service managers.

Authors:  Marcus Sellars; Karen M Detering; William Silvester
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Proxy perspectives regarding end-of-life care for persons with cancer.

Authors:  Marie Bakitas; Tim A Ahles; Karen Skalla; Frances C Brokaw; Ira Byock; Brett Hanscom; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Mark T Hegel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.