BACKGROUND: Serological typing of HLA has shown discrepancies in HLA associations with vitiligo in different ethnic populations. OBJECTIVES: To perform genotyping of HLA class II genes on a Dutch vitiligo population in order clearly to identify susceptible and protective HLA alleles in vitiligo. METHODS: HLA typing was carried out by amplifying genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by dot-blot hybridization with sequence-specific oligonucleotides (SSO). Fifty Dutch vitiligo probands, and their parents (150 individuals) and 204 healthy controls were studied. RESULTS: Family-based case-control association studies and linkage disequilibrium analysis showed the linkage and association of DRB4*0101 allele with vitiligo (P(c) = 0.0016, relative risk = 2.21). The family-based association study also provided evidence for linkage and association of DQB1*0303 allele with vitiligo (chi(2) = 7.36, P = 0.006). We measured the clinical relevance of the test by calculating the prevalence corrected positive predictive values (PcPPV). The PcPPV of disease for the DRB4*0101 allele was 0.017 and for the DRB4*0101/0101 genotype was 0.0358. In other words, a DRB4*0101/0101 genotype carries a 3.58% risk of developing vitiligo. CONCLUSIONS: Both DRB4*0101 and DQB1*0303 alleles provide significant susceptibility for vitiligo.
BACKGROUND: Serological typing of HLA has shown discrepancies in HLA associations with vitiligo in different ethnic populations. OBJECTIVES: To perform genotyping of HLA class II genes on a Dutch vitiligo population in order clearly to identify susceptible and protective HLA alleles in vitiligo. METHODS: HLA typing was carried out by amplifying genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by dot-blot hybridization with sequence-specific oligonucleotides (SSO). Fifty Dutch vitiligo probands, and their parents (150 individuals) and 204 healthy controls were studied. RESULTS: Family-based case-control association studies and linkage disequilibrium analysis showed the linkage and association of DRB4*0101 allele with vitiligo (P(c) = 0.0016, relative risk = 2.21). The family-based association study also provided evidence for linkage and association of DQB1*0303 allele with vitiligo (chi(2) = 7.36, P = 0.006). We measured the clinical relevance of the test by calculating the prevalence corrected positive predictive values (PcPPV). The PcPPV of disease for the DRB4*0101 allele was 0.017 and for the DRB4*0101/0101 genotype was 0.0358. In other words, a DRB4*0101/0101 genotype carries a 3.58% risk of developing vitiligo. CONCLUSIONS: Both DRB4*0101 and DQB1*0303 alleles provide significant susceptibility for vitiligo.
Authors: P Agretti; G De Marco; D Sansone; C Betterle; G Coco; A Dimida; E Ferrarini; A Pinchera; P Vitti; M Tonacchera Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Pamela R Fain; Katherine Gowan; Greggory S LaBerge; Asem Alkhateeb; Gary L Stetler; Janet Talbert; Dorothy C Bennett; Richard A Spritz Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2003-04-18 Impact factor: 11.025