Literature DB >> 11451781

A score for predicting risk of death from cardiovascular disease in adults with raised blood pressure, based on individual patient data from randomised controlled trials.

S J Pocock1, V McCormack, F Gueyffier, F Boutitie, R H Fagard, J P Boissel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To create a risk score for death from cardiovascular disease that can be easily used.
DESIGN: Data from eight randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive treatment.
SETTING: Europe and North America. PARTICIPANTS: 47 088 men and women from trials that had differing age ranges and differing eligibility criteria for blood pressure. MAIN OTUCOME MEASURE: 1639 deaths from cardiovascular causes during a mean 5.2 years of follow up.
RESULTS: Baseline factors were related to risk of death from cardiovascular disease using a multivariate Cox model, adjusting for trial and treatment group (active versus control). A risk score was developed from 11 factors: age, sex, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol concentration, height, serum creatinine concentration, cigarette smoking, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, history of stroke, and history of myocardial infarction. The risk score is an integer, with points added for each factor according to its association with risk. Smoking contributed more in women and in younger age groups. In women total cholesterol concentration mattered less than in men, whereas diabetes had more of an effect. Antihypertensive treatment reduced the score. The five year risk of death from cardiovascular disease for scores of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 was 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.8%, 2.3%, 6.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. Age and sex distributions of the score from the two UK trials enabled individual risk assessment to be age and sex specific. Risk prediction models are also presented for fatal coronary heart disease, fatal stroke, and all cause mortality.
CONCLUSION: The risk score is an objective aid to assessing an individual's risk of cardiovascular disease, including stroke and coronary heart disease. It is useful for physicians when determining an individual's need for antihypertensive treatment and other management strategies for cardiovascular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451781      PMCID: PMC34541          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  24 in total

1.  Randomised trial of treatment of hypertension in elderly patients in primary care.

Authors:  J Coope; T S Warrender
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-01

2.  Identifying men at high risk of heart attacks: strategy for use in general practice.

Authors:  A G Shaper; S J Pocock; A N Phillips; M Walker
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-08-23

3.  Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension)

Authors:  B Dahlöf; L H Lindholm; L Hansson; B Scherstén; T Ekbom; P O Wester
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-13

6.  Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program. I. Reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Dundee coronary risk-disk for management of change in risk factors.

Authors:  H Tunstall-Pedoe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-28

8.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P M Odell; P W Wilson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Multiple risk factor intervention trial. Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Risk factors for stroke in middle aged British men.

Authors:  A G Shaper; A N Phillips; S J Pocock; M Walker; P W Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11
View more
  55 in total

1.  Predicting risk of death from cardiovascular disease. Which measurements are the most appropriate?

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-27

2.  Validity of measures is no simple matter.

Authors:  Lee Sechrest
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of manidipine versus amlodipine in elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension: MAISH study.

Authors:  Antonio Coca Payeras; Krzysztof Sladek; Giuseppe Lembo; Marco Alberici
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  The relative merits of population-based and targeted prevention strategies.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Sandeep Vijan; Gilbert S Omenn; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Vascular disease in a population-based cohort of individuals hospitalised with coeliac disease.

Authors:  J F Ludvigsson; U de Faire; A Ekbom; S M Montgomery
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Stroke Risk Factors, Genetics, and Prevention.

Authors:  Amelia K Boehme; Charles Esenwa; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Information theoretical analysis of aging as a risk factor for heart disease.

Authors:  David Blokh; Ilia Stambler
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 8.  Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians.

Authors:  Stacey Sheridan; Michael Pignone; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Improving global vascular risk prediction with behavioral and anthropometric factors. The multiethnic NOMAS (Northern Manhattan Cohort Study).

Authors:  Ralph L Sacco; Minesh Khatri; Tatjana Rundek; Qiang Xu; Hannah Gardener; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Marco R Di Tullio; Shunichi Homma; Mitchell S V Elkind; Myunghee C Paik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Postprandial glucose improves the risk prediction of cardiovascular death beyond the metabolic syndrome in the nondiabetic population.

Authors:  Hung-Ju Lin; Bai-Chin Lee; Yi-Lwun Ho; Yen-Hung Lin; Ching-Yi Chen; Hsiu-Ching Hsu; Mao-Shin Lin; Kuo-Liong Chien; Ming-Fong Chen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.