Literature DB >> 11450962

Analysis of uncertainties in estimates of components of variance in multivariate ROC analysis.

S V Beiden1, R F Wagner, G Campbell, H P Chan.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Solutions have previously been presented to the problem of estimating the components of variance in the general linear model used for multivariate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The case where the variance components do not change across the modalities under comparison was first treated, followed by the case where they are permitted to change. No analysis of uncertainties in these estimates has been presented previously.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the case where the variance components do not change across modalities, the "jackknife-after-bootstrap" resampling procedure can be used together with conventional linear propagation of variance to solve for the uncertainties in estimates of the components. For the case where the components are permitted to change across modalities, a slight elaboration of this procedure is presented.
RESULTS: The approach was validated by Monte Carlo simulations, where uncertainties in estimates of the variance components calculated by the jackknife-after-bootstrap procedure were found to converge in the mean to the Monte Carlo results over many independent trials. The method is exemplified with data from a study of readers-with and without the aid of a computer-assist modality-given the task of discriminating benign from malignant masses in mammography.
CONCLUSION: The present approach is relevant to a broad class of problems where estimates of multiple contributions to the variance observed in ROC assessment of diagnostic modalities are desired, in particular, for the assessment of multiple-reader studies of computer-aided diagnosis in radiology where the variance components may change across reading modalities (eg, unaided vs computer-aided reading).

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11450962     DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80686-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

Review 1.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

2.  The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: Changing the confidence ratings.

Authors:  David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Carl R Fuhrman; Amy H Klym; Jill L King; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Generalized Roe and Metz receiver operating characteristic model: analytic link between simulated decision scores and empirical AUC variances and covariances.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-09-25

4.  A multitarget training method for artificial neural network with application to computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Bei Liu; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Stephen L Hillis; Filip Claus; Chantal Van Ongeval; Valerie Celis; Veerle Provoost; Hong-Jun Yoon; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations.

Authors:  David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Cathy S Cohen; Christiane M Hakim; Lara A Hardesty; Marie A Ganott; Ronald L Perrin; William R Poller; Ratan Shah; Jules H Sumkin; Luisa P Wallace; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Simulation of unequal-variance binormal multireader ROC decision data: an extension of the Roe and Metz simulation model.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Multi-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Brandon D Gallas; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.