Literature DB >> 11449019

Provision of pen along with questionnaire does not increase the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial.

T J Clark1, K S Khan, J K Gupta.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11449019      PMCID： PMC1731952          DOI： 10.1136/jech.55.8.595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN： 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?

Authors:  B R McAvoy; E F Kaner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

2.  Use of anticonvulsants in eclampsia and pre-eclampsia: survey of obstetricians in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  A M Gülmezoglu; L Duley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28
  2 in total
  10 in total

1.  Effects of disseminating research findings on response rates in a community survey: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D S Morrison; H Thomson; M Petticrew
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers.

Authors:  S D Rhodes; D A Bowie; K C Hergenrather
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey.

Authors:  Y Martins; R I Lederman; C L Lowenstein; S Joffe; B A Neville; B T Hastings; G A Abel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. ISRCTN 32032031.

Authors:  T J Clark; K S Khan; J K Gupta
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.

Authors:  Michaela Brtnikova; Lori A Crane; Mandy A Allison; Laura P Hurley; Brenda L Beaty; Allison Kempe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using pens as an incentive for trial recruitment of older adults: An embedded randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Katie Whiteside; Lydia Flett; Alex Mitchell; Caroline Fairhurst; Sarah Cockayne; Sara Rodgers; David Torgerson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-21

7.  Enclosing a pen to improve response rate to postal questionnaire: an embedded randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rachel Cunningham-Burley; Jenny Roche; Caroline Fairhurst; Sarah Cockayne; Catherine Hewitt; Heather Iles-Smith; David J Torgerson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 8.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

9.  A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study.

Authors:  Sabrina Winona Pit; Vibeke Hansen; Dan Ewald
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Effect of prize draw incentive on the response rate to a postal survey of obstetricians and gynaecologists: a randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32823119].

Authors:  Sharon H Moses; T Justin Clark
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-06-28       Impact factor: 2.655
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.