Literature DB >> 31964672

Educational differentials in key domains of physical activity by ethnicity, age and sex: a cross-sectional study of over 40 000 participants in the UK household longitudinal study (2013-2015).

Meg E Fluharty1, Snehal M Pinto Pereira2, Michaela Benzeval3, Mark Hamer4, Barbara Jefferis5, Lucy J Griffiths6, Rachel Cooper7, David Bann8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether educational differentials in three key physical activity (PA) domains vary by age, sex and ethnicity.
DESIGN: National cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether 40 270 participants, aged 20 years and over, from the UK Household Longitudinal Study with information on education, PA and demographics collected in 2013-2015. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation in active travel (AT), occupational activity (OA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) at the time of assessment.
RESULTS: Lower educational attainment was associated with higher AT and OA, but lower weekly LTPA activity; these associations were modified by sex, ethnicity and age. Education-related differences in AT were larger for women-the difference in predicted probability of activity between the highest and the lowest education groups was -10% in women (95% CI: -11.9% to 7.9%) and -3% in men (-4.8% to -0.4%). Education-related differences in OA were larger among men -35% (-36.9% to -32.4%) than women -17% (-19.4% to -15.0%). Finally, education-related differences in moderate-to-vigorous LTPA varied by ethnicity; for example, differences were 17% (16.2% to 18.7%) for white individuals compared with 6% (0.6% to 11.6%) for black individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: Educational differences in PA vary by domain and are modified by age, sex and ethnicity. A better understanding of physically inactive subgroups may aid development of interventions to both increase activity levels and reduce health inequalities. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; health disparities; physical activity

Year:  2020        PMID: 31964672      PMCID: PMC7045199          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  36 in total

Review 1.  Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies.

Authors:  C J Mann
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.

Authors:  Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Effects of socioeconomic status on the physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  R Stalsberg; A V Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  The health paradox of occupational and leisure-time physical activity.

Authors:  A Holtermann; J V Hansen; H Burr; K Søgaard; G Sjøgaard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health.

Authors:  Harold W Kohl; Cora Lynn Craig; Estelle Victoria Lambert; Shigeru Inoue; Jasem Ramadan Alkandari; Grit Leetongin; Sonja Kahlmeier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a 21-year tracking study.

Authors:  Risto Telama; Xiaolin Yang; Jorma Viikari; Ilkka Välimäki; Olli Wanne; Olli Raitakari
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Ethnic density effects on maternal and infant health in the Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kate E Pickett; Richard J Shaw; Karl Atkin; Kathleen E Kiernan; Richard G Wilkinson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Relation of employment status to socioeconomic position and physical activity types.

Authors:  Frank Popham; Richard Mitchell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Education-related disparities in reported physical activity during leisure-time, active transportation, and work among US adults: repeated cross-sectional analysis from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2007 to 2016.

Authors:  Shaun Scholes; David Bann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: a review and framework for future research.

Authors:  Jenna R Panter; Andrew P Jones; Esther Mf van Sluijs
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Associations between socioeconomic position and young people's physical activity and sedentary behaviour in the UK: a scoping review.

Authors:  Natalie Pearson; Paula Griffiths; Esther van Sluijs; Andrew J Atkin; Kamlesh Khunti; Lauren B Sherar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.006

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.