Literature DB >> 11448865

Increased flavor preference and lick activity for sucrose and corn oil in SWR/J vs. AKR/J mice.

B K Smith1, J Volaufova, D B West.   

Abstract

Nutrient preferences and orosensory responses were characterized in two mouse inbred strains. In two-bottle solution tests (tastant vs. vehicle; ascending concentrations), the effects of strain and chow type (12 or 26% fat) on preference thresholds for sucrose and corn oil were compared in AKR/J and SWR/J mice. SWR/J mice displayed lower preference thresholds and ingested more sucrose than AKR/J mice did. SWR/J mice also showed lower preference thresholds and consumed more corn oil than AKR/J mice did; corn oil preference was suppressed 3.5-fold in AKR/J mice compared with SWR/J mice when fed 26% fat chow. Next, licking was recorded during 30-s access to sucrose or corn oil across a range of concentrations. SWR/J mice licked the tastants more than AKR/J mice did. Analysis of modal interlick intervals during lick training revealed that SWR/J mice licked water faster than AKR/J mice when water deprived, suggesting that motor as well as sensory factors may determine lick responses to tastants in brief-access tests. Finally, in two-bottle tests pitting maximally preferred concentrations of sucrose (8 or 16%) against corn oil (20%), SWR/J mice highly preferred sucrose over corn oil at either sucrose concentration. AKR/J mice preferred corn oil over 8% sucrose but reversed their preference when 16% sucrose was offered. These results support a primary role of flavor in the nutrient preferences of SWR/J mice. In AKR/J mice, the low lick activity for sucrose and corn oil and greater suppression of corn oil preference by the high-fat chow suggest that their preferences depend more on postingestive factors than on flavor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448865     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.281.2.R596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  10 in total

1.  Feed efficiency, food choice, and food reward behaviors in young and old Fischer rats.

Authors:  Miriam García-San Frutos; Paul J Pistell; Donald K Ingram; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Cerebellar cortical output encodes temporal aspects of rhythmic licking movements and is necessary for normal licking frequency.

Authors:  Jerí L Bryant; John D Boughter; Suzhen Gong; Mark S LeDoux; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Genetic variance contributes to dopamine and opioid receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of intralipid (fat) intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Cheryl T Dym; Veronica S Bae; Tamar Kraft; Yakov Yakubov; Amanda Winn; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Nicotine Self-Administration With Tobacco Flavor Additives in Male Rats.

Authors:  Matthew I Palmatier; Amanda L Smith; Ethan M Odineal; Emily A Williams; Ashley B Sheppard; Curtis A Bradley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Modulation of taste responsiveness by the satiation hormone peptide YY.

Authors:  Michael S La Sala; Maria D Hurtado; Alicia R Brown; Diego V Bohórquez; Rodger A Liddle; Herbert Herzog; Sergei Zolotukhin; Cedrick D Dotson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  The relationship between PROP and ethanol preferences: an evaluation of 4 inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Theresa L White; Laura V Dishaw; Paul R Sheehe; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-06-19

8.  Genetic control of a central pattern generator: rhythmic oromotor movement in mice is controlled by a major locus near Atp1a2.

Authors:  John D Boughter; Megan K Mulligan; Steven J St John; Kenichi Tokita; Lu Lu; Detlef H Heck; Robert W Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Behavioral genetics and taste.

Authors:  John D Boughter; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Serum Level of miR-1 and miR-155 as Potential Biomarkers of Stress-Resilience of NET-KO and SWR/J Mice.

Authors:  Joanna Solich; Maciej Kuśmider; Agata Faron-Górecka; Paulina Pabian; Magdalena Kolasa; Beata Zemła; Marta Dziedzicka-Wasylewska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.