Literature DB >> 11448557

Comparison of the Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay, Denka MRSA-Screen Assay, and BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

J Arbique1, K Forward, D Haldane, R Davidson.   

Abstract

Early detection of methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) is critical for both the management of infected patients, and the timely institution of appropriate infection control measures. Although detection of the mecA gene by PCR remains the gold standard, this technology is inaccessible for many laboratories. Therefore, we sought to evaluate several new rapid identification systems and compare them to PCR. A total of 71 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 25 borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA), and 213 MRSA were selected for study. S.aureus was identified using standard methods. Initial screening was performed on a Mueller-Hinton agar plate with 6 mg/L of oxacillin. MRSA strains were identified using PCR with primers specific for the mecA gene. PCR was used as the reference method. All isolates were tested using the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Maryland, USA), the MRSA-Screen Assay (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay (ID Biomedical Corp, Vancouver, BC). With minor modifications, all assays were performed according to manufacturers' instructions. Overall, the 3 commercial assays performed well. The sensitivity and specificity of the BBL, Denka, and Velogene systems were 99%/100%, 99%/100%, and 96%/100% respectively. The advantages of the phenotypic tests-BBL Crystal Kit and Denka MRSA-Screen Assay include lower cost per test, shelf-life, ease of use, and rapid turn-around times. Advantages of the Velogene Rapid MRSA include ability to perform genotypic high-volume testing without the equipment requirements and technical complexity involved with PCR. Turn-around times ranged from 15 min for the Denka MRSA-Screen Assay, 2 h for the Velogene Rapid MRSA, and 4 h for the BBL Crystal. The BBL Crystal, Denka MRSA-Screen, and Velogene Rapid MRSA identification systems are rapid, easy to perform, and provide accurate identification of MRSA. These rapid kits offer an acceptable alternative for smaller, non-reference, laboratories and reduce the dependency on PCR in larger laboratories for routine confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448557     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(01)00245-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  6 in total

Review 1.  Rapid detection of antimicrobial-resistant organism carriage: an unmet clinical need.

Authors:  Daniel J Diekema; Kirsty J Dodgson; Bryndis Sigurdardottir; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Diagnostic PCR analysis of the occurrence of methicillin and tetracycline resistance genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from phase 3 clinical trials of tigecycline for complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  C Hal Jones; Margareta Tuckman; Anita Y M Howe; Mark Orlowski; Stanley Mullen; Karen Chan; Patricia A Bradford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Two new colorimetric methods for early detection of vancomycin and oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ahmet Y Coban; Bülent Bozdogan; Cigdem Cekic Cihan; Ebru Cetinkaya; Kemal Bilgin; Ozge Darka; Alper Akgunes; Belma Durupinar; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of an isothermal signal amplification method for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patient-screening swabs.

Authors:  Katrina Levi; Claire Bailey; Alexandra Bennett; Peter Marsh; Don L N Cardy; Kevin J Towner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Colorimetric method for rapid detection of Oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and its comparison with PCR for mec A gene.

Authors:  Niraj Ghanwate; Prashant Thakare; P R Bhise; Sonali Gawande
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of rapid screening and pre-emptive contact isolation for detecting and controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in critical care: an interventional cohort study.

Authors:  Stephan Harbarth; Cristina Masuet-Aumatell; Jacques Schrenzel; Patrice Francois; Christophe Akakpo; Gesuele Renzi; Jerome Pugin; Bara Ricou; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.