Literature DB >> 11448318

The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, II: characteristics of patients enrolled and not enrolled. COMS Report No. 17.

M Diener-West, J D Earle, S L Fine, B S Hawkins, C S Moy, S M Reynolds, A P Schachat, B R Straatsma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics of patients evaluated for the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized clinical trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma by enrollment status, and to compare characteristics of patients enrolled with those of patients with tumors of eligible size who did not enroll in order to assess the extent to which findings from the clinical trial can be generalized to future patients.
METHODS: For all patients diagnosed with choroidal melanoma and evaluated for the clinical trial at COMS centers from November 1986 through July 31, 1998, selected data were transmitted to the COMS Coordinating Center, Baltimore, Md, where they were integrated and analyzed. Data included ophthalmic and medical history, examination findings, and visual acuity measurements recorded prior to enrollment; standardized A- and B-scan echographic examination findings; and wide-angle fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms.
RESULTS: Of 8712 patients with choroidal melanoma, 5046 had tumors of eligible size; of these, 2882 (57%) were eligible for enrollment, and 1317 (46% of eligible patients, 26% of patients with tumors of eligible size) enrolled. Most differences between eligible and ineligible patients corresponded to eligibility and exclusion criteria. However, ineligible patients were older and had thicker tumors than eligible patients. Eligible patients who enrolled were slightly older and had larger tumors than those who did not enroll. Nearly half (48%) of enrolled patients had choroidal melanoma with the apex located temporal to the fovea, compared with 40% of eligible patients not enrolled and 29% of ineligible patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial was designed to yield internally valid treatment comparisons through random assignment to treatment at time of enrollment. Information from this and other studies document that enrolled patients were similar to other patients with choroidal melanoma who were treated with 125I brachytherapy. These findings support the external validity of the trial and applicability of treatment findings to all patients who meet the criteria used to judge eligibility for the trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448318     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  21 in total

1.  Radiotherapy in ophthalmology : 2004 Jules Gonin lecture of the Retina Research Foundation.

Authors:  Leonidas Zografos
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparative outcomes and toxicities for ruthenium-106 versus palladium-103 in the treatment of choroidal melanoma.

Authors:  Hasan Danish; Matthew J Ferris; Ehsan Balagamwala; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Kirtesh R Patel; Maria Choudhary; Caroline Craven; Pia Mendoza; John Suh; Chris Bergstrom; Hans E Grossniklaus; Thomas M Aaberg; Arun Singh; Ian R Crocker; Mohammad K Khan
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Uveal melanoma treated with iodine-125 episcleral plaque: an analysis of dose on disease control and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Bradford A Perez; Pradeep Mettu; Lejla Vajzovic; Douglas Rivera; Ali Alkaissi; Beverly A Steffey; Jing Cai; Sandra Stinnett; Jonathan J Dutton; Edward G Buckley; Edward Halperin; Lawrence B Marks; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; David G Kirsch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Imaging of Uveal Melanoma-Current Standard and Methods in Development.

Authors:  Małgorzata Solnik; Natalia Paduszyńska; Anna M Czarnecka; Kamil J Synoradzki; Yacoub A Yousef; Tomasz Chorągiewicz; Robert Rejdak; Mario Damiano Toro; Sandrine Zweifel; Katarzyna Dyndor; Michał Fiedorowicz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Uveal Melanoma: Refusal of Treatment.

Authors:  Randy Christopher Bowen; Soto Hansell; Vishal Raval; Jacquelyn M Davanzo; Arun D Singh
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2021-08-27

6.  Uveal melanoma in the Saudi Arabian population: Two decades of management at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital.

Authors:  Adel H Alsuhaibani
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-05

7.  Optic disc dose reduction in ocular brachytherapy using 125 I notched COMS plaques: A simulation study based on current clinical practice.

Authors:  Yongsook C Lee; Shih-Chi Lin; Yongbok Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The impact of socioeconomic status on melanoma clinical trial participation: an observational cohort study from Australia.

Authors:  Joshua L Lee; Lauren E Haydu; John F Thompson; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

Review 9.  Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research?

Authors:  David Wendler; Raynard Kington; Jennifer Madans; Gretchen Van Wye; Heidi Christ-Schmidt; Laura A Pratt; Otis W Brawley; Cary P Gross; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Small High-Risk Uveal Melanomas Have a Lower Mortality Rate.

Authors:  Rumana N Hussain; Sarah E Coupland; Helen Kalirai; Azzam F G Taktak; Antonio Eleuteri; Bertil E Damato; Carl Groenewald; Heinrich Heimann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.