Literature DB >> 11448041

Highly comprehensive karyotype analysis by a combination of spectral karyotyping (SKY), microdissection, and reverse painting (SKY-MD).

J Weimer1, M R Koehler, U Wiedemann, P Attermeyer, A Jacobsen, D Karow, M Kiechl, W Jonat, N Arnold.   

Abstract

A technique disclosing most information about chromosome modifications is the technique of choice for the analysis of chromosome alterations. The newly developed method for microdissection of fluorescence-labeled chromosomes (FISH-MD) can improve upon this expectation in combination with 24-color spectral karyotyping (SKY). The highly efficient way to detect chromosome modifications by SKY and the detailed specification of aberrant chromosomes by FISH-MD prompted us to use both techniques in a combined approach called SKY-MD. First, an overview of chromosomal aberrations is obtained by spectral karyotyping and subsequently the derivative chromosomes recognized are characterized in a highly specific manner by microdissection and reverse painting. A small quantity of isolated material dissected directly from a 24-color metaphase is sufficient to obtain very detailed information about the chromosome regions and the breakpoints involved in the derivative chromosomes. Therefore, the combination of spectral karyotyping and microdissection in one procedure, and reverse painting can characterize chromosomal aberrations with a degree of specificity hitherto unknown from individual karyotyping experiments. In this article we compare the efficiency of both the SKY technique and that of classical microdissection with the efficiency obtained by SKY-MD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448041     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016735618513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  24 in total

1.  Spectral karyotyping combined with locus-specific FISH simultaneously defines genes and chromosomes involved in chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  G Tonon; A Roschke; K Stover; Y Shou; W M Kuehl; I R Kirsch
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  A review of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): current status and future prospects.

Authors:  J Nath; K L Johnson
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  A method for the rapid sequence-independent amplification of microdissected chromosomal material.

Authors:  S K Bohlander; R Espinosa; M M Le Beau; J D Rowley; M O Díaz
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  N P Carter; M A Ferguson-Smith; M T Perryman; H Telenius; A H Pelmear; M A Leversha; M T Glancy; S L Wood; K Cook; H M Dyson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Microdissection of banded human chromosomes.

Authors:  G Senger; H J Lüdecke; B Horsthemke; U Claussen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Prenatal diagnosis of a half-cryptic translocation using chromosome microdissection.

Authors:  G Senger; I Chudoba; U Friedrich; N Tommerup; U Claussen; K Brøndum-Nielsen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Modes of DAPI banding and simultaneous in situ hybridization.

Authors:  H H Heng; L C Tsui
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 9.  Chromosome microdissection: a brief overview.

Authors:  L A Cannizzaro
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1996

Review 10.  Genetic instabilities in human cancers.

Authors:  C Lengauer; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Reverse painting highlights the origin of chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  Elisabeth Blennow
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  The t(14,15) in mouse strain CBA/CaH-T(14;15)6Ca/J causes a break in the ADAMTS12 gene.

Authors:  Bengi Acar-Perk; Karen Bräutigam; Regina Grunewald; Andreas Schmutzler; Christian Schem; Norbert K Arnold; Walter Jonat; Jörg Weimer
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Generation of chromosome painting probes from single chromosomes by laser microdissection and linker-adaptor PCR.

Authors:  Stefan Thalhammer; Sabine Langer; Michael R Speicher; Wolfgang M Heckl; Jochen B Geigl
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.