Literature DB >> 11447578

Partial irradiation of the rectum.

A Jackson1.   

Abstract

Data gathered from dose escalation protocols for the treatment of prostate cancers conducted in the past 10 years have shown that rectal toxicity can be controlled by the use of careful conformal techniques. The most severe complications of rectal irradiation (obstruction and fistula requiring colostomy) have been essentially eliminated. The most frequent gastrointestinal complications of conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer are now rectal bleeding associated with telangiectatic changes to the vasculature of the submucosa, and in severe cases, ulceration requiring cautery procedures and or transfusion. The benefits of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) are strongly technique dependent, with a strong dose response for single techniques for prescription doses over 70 Gy. Studies of rectal motion show that the anterior wall can move approximately 1 cm during treatment, so portions of the anterior rectal wall will regularly receive the full prescription dose if posterior margin sizes >/= 1 cm are used in designing the planning target volume (PTV). There is strong evidence that increased rectal shielding and posterior PTV margin sizes approximately 0.6 cm reduce rectal complication rates. Despite uncertainties due to rectal motion, studies of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) show that rectal toxicity is strongly influenced by the percent volumes of rectal wall exposed to doses approximately 70 Gy and higher. Recent data suggests that percent volumes of rectal wall exposed doses between 40 to 50 Gy, and the existence of a reserve of unexposed tissue may also play a role in determining rectal bleeding rates. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11447578     DOI: 10.1053/srao.2001.23481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  6 in total

1.  The lessons of QUANTEC: recommendations for reporting and gathering data on dose-volume dependencies of treatment outcome.

Authors:  Andrew Jackson; Lawrence B Marks; Søren M Bentzen; Avraham Eisbruch; Ellen D Yorke; Randal K Ten Haken; Louis S Constine; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The minimum knowledge base for predicting organ-at-risk dose-volume levels and plan-related complications in IMRT planning.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Robert R Meyer; Leyuan Shi; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Modeling plan-related clinical complications using machine learning tools in a multiplan IMRT framework.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Warren D D'Souza; Leyuan Shi; Robert R Meyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  The association of rectal equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) to late rectal toxicity in locally advanced cervical cancer patients who were evaluated by rectosigmoidoscopy in Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University.

Authors:  Ekkasit Tharavichtikul; Pooriwat Meungwong; Taned Chitapanarux; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Somsak Wanwilairat; Patrinee Traisathit; Razvan Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2014-06-30

5.  Stereotactic IMRT for prostate cancer: setup accuracy of a new stereotactic body localization system.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Rojymon Jacob; Lili Chen; Charlie Ma; Benjamin Movsas; Steve Feigenberg; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and forward-planning dynamic arc therapy techniques for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed Metwaly; Awaad Mousa Awaad; El-Sayed Mahmoud El-Sayed; Abdel Sattar Mohamed Sallam
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.