Literature DB >> 11443346

Evolution rates of genes on leading and lagging DNA strands.

D Szczepanik1, P Mackiewicz, M Kowalczuk, A Gierlik, A Nowicka, M R Dudek, S Cebrat.   

Abstract

One of the main causes of bacterial chromosome asymmetry is replication-associated mutational pressure. Different rates of nucleotide substitution accumulation on leading and lagging strands implicate qualitative and quantitative differences in the accumulation of mutations in protein coding sequences lying on different DNA strands. We show that the divergence rate of orthologs situated on leading strands is lower than the divergence rate of those situated on lagging strands. The ratio of the mutation accumulation rate for sequences lying on lagging strands to that of sequences lying on leading strands is rather stable and time-independent. The divergence rate of sequences which changed their positions, with respect to the direction of replication fork movement, is not stable-sequences which have recently changed their positions are the most prone to mutation accumulation. This effect may influence estimations of evolutionary distances between species and the topology of phylogenetic trees.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443346     DOI: 10.1007/s002390010172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  10 in total

1.  Similar compositional biases are caused by very different mutational effects.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Marie Touchon; Edward J Feil
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Comparative investigation of the various determinants that influence the codon and amino acid usage patterns in the genus Bifidobacterium.

Authors:  Ayan Roy; Subhasish Mukhopadhyay; Indrani Sarkar; Arnab Sen
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Matthew S Ackerman; Jean-Francois Gout; Hongan Long; Way Sung; W Kelley Thomas; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Accelerated gene evolution through replication-transcription conflicts.

Authors:  Sandip Paul; Samuel Million-Weaver; Sujay Chattopadhyay; Evgeni Sokurenko; Houra Merrikh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Purifying selection, sequence composition, and context-specific indel mutations shape intraspecific variation in a bacterial endosymbiont.

Authors:  Laura E Williams; Jennifer J Wernegreen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Flip-flop around the origin and terminus of replication in prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  P Mackiewicz; D Mackiewicz; M Kowalczuk; S Cebrat
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Optimization of Mutation Pressure in Relation to Properties of Protein-Coding Sequences in Bacterial Genomes.

Authors:  Paweł Błażej; Błażej Miasojedow; Małgorzata Grabińska; Paweł Mackiewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quantitative analysis of mutation and selection pressures on base composition skews in bacterial chromosomes.

Authors:  Chi Chen; Carton W Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Optimization of amino acid replacement costs by mutational pressure in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Paweł Błażej; Dorota Mackiewicz; Małgorzata Grabińska; Małgorzata Wnętrzak; Paweł Mackiewicz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Potential causes and consequences of rapid mitochondrial genome evolution in thermoacidophilic Galdieria (Rhodophyta).

Authors:  Chung Hyun Cho; Seung In Park; Claudia Ciniglia; Eun Chan Yang; Louis Graf; Debashish Bhattacharya; Hwan Su Yoon
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.