Literature DB >> 11442122

A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images.

D Vergnaghi1, A Monti, E Setti, R Musumeci.   

Abstract

For the diagnosis of breast cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), one of the most important parameters is the analysis of contrast enhancement. A three-dimensional MR sequence is applied before and five times after bolus injection of paramagnetic contrast medium (Gd-DTPA). The dynamics of absorption are described by a time/intensity enhancement curve, which reports the mean intensity of the MR signal in a small region of interest (ROI) for about 8 minutes after contrast injection. The aim of our study was to use an artificial neural network to automatically classify the enhancement curves as "benign" or "malignant." We used a classic feed-forward back-propagation neural network, with three layers: five input nodes, two hidden nodes, and one output node. The network has been trained with 26 pathologic curves (10 invasive carcinoma [K], two carcinoma-in-situ [DCIS], and 14 benign lesion [B]). The trained network has been tested with 58 curves (36 K, one DCIS, 21 B). The network was able to correctly identify the test curves with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 90%. For comparison, the same set of curves was analyzed separately by two radiologists (a breast MR expert and a resident radiologist). The first correctly interpreted the curves with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 90%, while the second scored 59% for sensitivity and 90% for specificity. These results demonstrate that a trained neural network recognizes the pathologic curves at least as well as an expert radiologist. This algorithm can help the radiologist attain rapid and affordable screening of a large number of ROIs. A complete automatic computer-aided diagnosis support system should find a number of potentially interesting ROIs and automatically analyze the enhancement curves for each ROI by neural networks, reporting to the radiologist only the potentially pathologic ROIs for a more accurate, manual, repeated evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11442122      PMCID: PMC3452688          DOI: 10.1007/BF03190297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  3 in total

1.  Neural network-based analysis of MR time series.

Authors:  H Fischer; J Hennig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Neural network analysis of breast cancer from MRI findings.

Authors:  P Abdolmaleki; L D Buadu; S Murayama; J Murakami; N Hashiguchi; H Yabuuchi; K Masuda
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct
  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Empirical assessment of bias in machine learning diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Ryan J Crowley; Yuan Jin Tan; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast.

Authors:  Botond K Szabó; Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg; Beata Boné; Peter Aspelin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of feasibility to use computer aided texture analysis based tool for parametric images of suspicious lesions in DCE-MR mammography.

Authors:  Mehmet Cemil Kale; John David Fleig; Nazım Imal
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 4.  Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Roberta Fusco; Mario Sansone; Salvatore Filice; Guglielmo Carone; Daniela Maria Amato; Carlo Sansone; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.