Literature DB >> 11440256

Filmless in 60 days: the impact of picture archiving and communications systems within a large urban hospital.

D B Hayt1, S Alexander, J Drakakis, N Berdebes.   

Abstract

Many large urban hospitals converting to filmless radiography use a phased approach for digital imaging implementation. In fact, this strategy often is recommended by picture archival communication systems (PACS) experts and vendors alike for large, busy hospitals installing PACS in existing physical facilities. The concern is that comprehensive conversion from film-based to digital imaging may be too overwhelming an adjustment in operations for a medical staff to effectively handle without serious disruption of workflow for patient treatment and care. Elmhurst Hospital Center is a 543-bed hospital located in the Borough of Queens in New York City. Owned by the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, this municipal teaching hospital provides services to a patient mix that is 38% indigent with no insurance, 50% covered by Medicaid or Medicare, and 12% affiliated with HMOs. Most inpatients are admitted through the emergency department. Forty-five percent of all radiology procedures conducted are for emergency patients. Historically, up to 25% of all diagnostic imaging examinations were never reported formally by radiologists. Report turnaround time for the remaining 75% was unacceptable, with only 3% of all imaging examinations reported within a 12-hour period in 1996. Both situations existed in great part because physicians and residents who felt they needed access to films simply took them. Many were never located or returned days after they were taken. In 1998, Elmhurst Hospital Center replaced its RIS and added voice recognition dictation capabilities in January 1999. A hospitalwide PACS was deployed 10 months later. With the exception of mammography, the hospital converted to filmless radiography within 60 days. The critical objectives to maintain control of films and radically improve the reporting process were achieved immediately. Over 99% of all examinations now are formally reviewed and reported. Only 7% of all reports take 1 or more days to generate. This report describes Elmhurst Hospital's efforts to make improvements in the delivery of radiology services and the reasons attributed to its rapid conversion to becoming a filmless (mammography excluded) medical center. The impact of the PACS on radiology department operations and service is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11440256      PMCID: PMC3452758          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-001-0004-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  Evolutionistic or revolutionary paths? A PACS maturity model for strategic situational planning.

Authors:  Rogier van de Wetering; Ronald Batenburg; Reeva Lederman
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications.

Authors:  Hye Seong Kim; Boo Kyung Han; Ki Seok Choo; Yong Hwan Jeon; Jung Han Kim; Yeon Hyeon Choe
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Creation and storage of standards-based pre-scanning patient questionnaires in PACS as DICOM objects.

Authors:  Tracy J Robinson; Scott L DuVall; Richard H Wiggins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Process modification and emergency department radiology service.

Authors:  Robert DeFlorio; Bret Coughlin; Ryan Coughlin; Haiping Li; John Santoro; Bridget Akey; Michael Favreau
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-07-30

5.  Evaluating the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems in Newfoundland and Labrador--a cost benefit analysis.

Authors:  Don MacDonald; Doreen Neville
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Breast screen new South wales generally demonstrates good radiologic viewing conditions.

Authors:  BaoLin Pauline Soh; Warwick Lee; Jennifer L Diffey; Mark F McEntee; Peter L Kench; Warren M Reed; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Practical issues in picture archiving and communication system and networking.

Authors:  Arjun Kalyanpur; Jasbir Singh; Ricky Bedi
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-02

8.  Creation and usability testing of a web-based pre-scanning radiology patient safety and history questionnaire set.

Authors:  Tracy J Robinson; Scott DuVall; Richard Wiggins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 9.  The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Isla M Hains; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  The effectiveness of service delivery initiatives at improving patients' waiting times in clinical radiology departments: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Olisemeke; Y F Chen; K Hemming; A Girling
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.