Literature DB >> 11440069

Clinical trials in a rural population: professional education aspects.

L H Maurer1, T Davis, S Hammond, E Smith, P West, M Doolittle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the majority of cancer patients in rural New Hampshire and Vermont are treated in community hospitals, few have entered clinical trials. This report describes a rural hospital consortium as a single Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) affiliate that used local cancer teams and itinerant oncologists to develop a clinical trials program.
METHOD: Grafted onto an existing oncology outreach program, educational programs were developed to help identify patients and recruit them to cooperative group clinical trials. Outcomes included the number of patients accrued to clinical trials, and a comparison of the quality of audited research records with those of affiliated institutions of the CALGB. The consequences of the program were to measure changes in patterns of care of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers during the study period. These included diagnostic, staging, and treatment changes that occurred over time.
RESULTS: 3.3% of incident cases were accrued to clinical trials during the study period, more often for breast and colorectal than for lung and prostate cancers. Reasons that were identified for low accrual were lack of clinical trials for the majority of cases, including the elderly. More than 65% of the patients in the outreach population were older than 65, compared with 50% at the cancer center. Patterns of care did change for breast and prostate cancers, but were similar to national trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11440069     DOI: 10.1080/08858190109528739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  7 in total

1.  Barriers to clinical trial participation: a comparison of rural and urban communities in South Carolina.

Authors:  Sei-Hill Kim; Andrea Tanner; Daniela B Friedman; Caroline Foster; Caroline D Bergeron
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  Clinical research for older adults in rural areas: the MINDED study experience.

Authors:  Bertrand Fougère; Mylène Aubertin-Leheudre; Bruno Vellas; Sandrine Andrieu; Laurent Demougeot; Céline Cluzan; Matteo Cesari
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 3.  Metrics for evaluating patient navigation during cancer diagnosis and treatment: crafting a policy-relevant research agenda for patient navigation in cancer care.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel Dohan; Peter Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Involving American Indians and medically underserved rural populations in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel G Petereit; Petra Helbig; David Koop; Patricia Kussman; Emily Fox Dunn; Asha Patnaik
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Barriers to cancer clinical trial participation among American Indian and Alaska Native tribal college students.

Authors:  Debra Sprague; Joan Russo; Donna L LaVallie; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Addressing Cancer Disparities Among American Indians through Innovative Technologies and Patient Navigation: The Walking Forward Experience.

Authors:  Daniel G Petereit; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Rosemary Wong; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  A multicomponent frailty intervention for socioeconomically vulnerable older adults: a designed-delay study.

Authors:  Il-Young Jang; Hee-Won Jung; Hyelim Park; Chang Ki Lee; Sang Soo Yu; Young Soo Lee; Eunju Lee; Robert J Glynn; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.458

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.